-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alert "too many empty pages" #544
Comments
Hey everyone, |
I don't know why this happens, I guess some unfortunate interaction of showif + block order. Can you just separate the survey into three and randomize at the run level? |
Thanks for your quick response. |
Dear Mira
In case you haven't engaged in the solution provided by Ruben, you can try
to add a "note" item, in between where you have consecutive "submit" items.
For example: Between rows 14&15, 27&28, 40&41 etc..
best
Cyril
…On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:26 PM mpreis2 ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for your quick response.
Randomizing at the run level was my backup plan. It is a bit more complex
but it will work. :-)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#544 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARL5ZYCBYJ64XQ2TXOFMBDY77AZRAVCNFSM6AAAAABG76MR3WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBVHA3DSNZRGI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Dear Cyril,
thanks, I already created three surveys out of the one and use the skip function. This works perfectly.
Best
Mira
Von: Cyril ***@***.***>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2024 11:10
An: rubenarslan/formr.org ***@***.***>
Cc: Preis, Mira ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Betreff: Re: [rubenarslan/formr.org] Alert "too many empty pages" (Issue #544)
Dear Mira
In case you haven't engaged in the solution provided by Ruben, you can try
to add a "note" item, in between where you have consecutive "submit" items.
For example: Between rows 14&15, 27&28, 40&41 etc..
best
Cyril
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 6:26 PM mpreis2 ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for your quick response.
Randomizing at the run level was my backup plan. It is a bit more complex
but it will work. :-)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#544 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARL5ZYCBYJ64XQ2TXOFMBDY77AZRAVCNFSM6AAAAABG76MR3WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBVHA3DSNZRGI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#544 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIFYS5JZHQF2GW6POENZM5LZAH7GHAVCNFSM6AAAAABG76MR3WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBZHE3DQOJQG4>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Discussed in #543
Originally posted by mpreis2 April 30, 2024
Hey everyone,
In my study participants complete a questionnaire repeatedly at three measurement points. The questionnaire consists of 36 scenarios. After each scenario, three possible interpretations of the scenario appear in a randomized order and the participants need to rate how much they agree with each possible interpretation. At each of the three measurement points only a subset of twelve scenarios is shown and the order of the subsets per measurement point should be counterbalanced.
That’s why I divided all participants into three groups (via the shuffle function) before the first questionnaire and used the “show if” function in the questionnaire (shuffle$group == 1 for the first subset of scenarios, shuffle$group == 2 for the second subset of scenarios, shuffle$group == 3 for the third subset of scenarios).
If I use the “test run” function, I get the alert “too many empty pages in this survey. Please alert an administrator”. If I then use the refresh button, it takes some time but then the questionnaire is displayed correctly and the answers are saved as well.
I think the problem has something to do with the high number of “show ifs” used in the questionnaire because if I was assigned to shufflegroup 1, the questionnaire works till the last item and the alert only shows after that. At that time the mass of “show ifs” begins in the questionnaire for this group. If I was assigned to shufflegroup 2 or 3, the alert appears after the instruction, which is the time when the mass of “show ifs” begin for these two groups.
I found three earlier conversations in the google group concerning this alert and one member (j_ 5chneider, 30.09.2029) suggested a similar explanation. However, I did not find a solution for the problem.
I included a minimal json file and the google sheet of the questionnaire (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19sC2Kd4mdoXk8grd4K-ZOVeucU3n3M6ZAdTnPMAkIk4/edit#gid=0) and would be thrilled if you could help me out.
ideal_IB_test.json
Thanks a lot, and best wishes
Mira
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: