Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Definir la licencia que tendrá el libro #4

Open
jjconti opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 7 comments
Open

Definir la licencia que tendrá el libro #4

jjconti opened this issue Nov 26, 2014 · 7 comments
Milestone
Imprenta

Comments

@jjconti
Copy link
Contributor

jjconti commented Nov 26, 2014

No description provided.

@jjconti jjconti added this to the Imprenta milestone Nov 26, 2014
@gcourault
Copy link
Contributor

Creative Commons Attribute 4.0

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

@eloyesp
Copy link
Member

eloyesp commented Nov 27, 2014

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ o gpl

@gcourault
Copy link
Contributor

La licencia para documentación GPL hay que incluirla completa en el texto
(así era antes al menos)

@jjconti
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjconti commented Nov 28, 2014

La GPL para documentos es http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html

@jjconti
Copy link
Contributor Author

jjconti commented Nov 28, 2014

Eloy, Gustavo, ya que plantean dos licencias distintas, puede justificar su preferencia?

@gcourault
Copy link
Contributor

Y vos que opinás Juanjo?

2014-11-27 22:21 GMT-03:00 Juan José Conti [email protected]:

Eloy, Gustavo, ya que plantean dos licencias distintas, puede justificar
su preferencia?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment)
.

Gustavo Courault
http://www.courault.com.ar/

@gcourault
Copy link
Contributor

Supongo que si continuamos, ¿elegimos la licencia CCA 4.0 entonces?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Imprenta
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jjconti @eloyesp @gcourault