You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If two sets of facets are used that display counts, when one of these adds a filter, the counts do not update on the other facets, which is not representative of the state. Currently this is done because if they did update for the facet being changed, all the values would go to zero, but this is not so logical if multiple facets are involved.
cc @jrhodes-sitback
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If two sets of facets are used that display counts, when one of these adds a filter, the counts do not update on the other facets, which is not representative of the state. Currently this is done because if they did update for the facet being changed, all the values would go to zero, but this is not so logical if multiple facets are involved.
cc @jrhodes-sitback
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: