Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi,
You can see the raw P-values are the same. DEseq2 uses a different way to adjust the raw P-values (They use FDR-based method) from what Seurat does (Seurat uses Bonferroni correction), so the p-adj you see are different from each other. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm having issues comparing DESeq2 results when run through FindMarkers versus when DESeq2 is run on its own. (I know that Seurat is planning to drop DESeq2 support, but I'd still like to track down this discrepancy.)
In the code below, the DESeq2 calls mirrors those in the DESeq2DETest function (https://github.com/satijalab/seurat/blob/master/R/differential_expression.R). The results when DESeq2 is run manually in
res
are different from results when run throughFindMarkers(pbmc_small, ident.1=1, ident.2=2, test.use="DESeq2", slot="counts")
.What am I doing wrong here? Thanks!
My sessionInfo():
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions