You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
subset() function does not seem to respect the order of indices. For example, spe[c(2,1), ] will return the same result as subset[c(1,2), ]. The same goes with spe[, 1:2] and spe[, c(2,1)]. I am not sure if this is by design or a bug, but it is not intuitive and is not consistent with what's expected. When I tested it with SingleCellExperiment, sce[1:2, ] is different from sce[c(2,1), ]. This means there is no efficient way of permuting rows (genes) or columns (cells) in Seurat object.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
subset() function does not seem to respect the order of indices. For example, spe[c(2,1), ] will return the same result as subset[c(1,2), ]. The same goes with spe[, 1:2] and spe[, c(2,1)]. I am not sure if this is by design or a bug, but it is not intuitive and is not consistent with what's expected. When I tested it with SingleCellExperiment, sce[1:2, ] is different from sce[c(2,1), ]. This means there is no efficient way of permuting rows (genes) or columns (cells) in Seurat object.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions