You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Assuming there are 2 different chains (A, B) with 2 different required sets of marketmap assets (set-A, set-B), is it possible to configure slinky to generate set-C that contains set-A and set-B, and allow a single instance of slinky to provide prices to chain A and chain B?
Assuming more chains onboard with Slinky, and validators decide to run them from a single high-spec hardware machine with a single IP, multiple slinky instances from the same ip can potentially cause rate-limiting issues from exchanges or other endpoints.
Furthermore assuming set-A contains all of set-B marketmap assets, there is some redundancy in running more than 1 instance of slinky when both chain-A and chain-B could potentially grab prices from the same slinky instance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Assuming there are 2 different chains (A, B) with 2 different required sets of marketmap assets (
set-A
,set-B
), is it possible to configure slinky to generateset-C
that containsset-A
andset-B
, and allow a single instance of slinky to provide prices to chain A and chain B?Assuming more chains onboard with Slinky, and validators decide to run them from a single high-spec hardware machine with a single IP, multiple slinky instances from the same ip can potentially cause rate-limiting issues from exchanges or other endpoints.
Furthermore assuming
set-A
contains all ofset-B
marketmap assets, there is some redundancy in running more than 1 instance of slinky when both chain-A and chain-B could potentially grab prices from the same slinky instance.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: