-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] multiple quantile regression #107
Comments
maybe out of scope for the current PR; but one question, @Ram0nB - there are different ways to deal with quantile crossing. Should we, and if yes how, take these into account? |
Good one. We could provide the user a "method" parameter similar to Sktime's Imputer, provide the user a quantile_crossing_callable similar to Sktime's FunctionTransformer, or both. What are your thoughts on this @fkiraly ? Maybe we can open an enhancement issue for this for now? |
Fixes #107 For quantile regression, often more than one quantile probability is of interest. However, existing Sklearn compatible quantile regressors always fit and predict a single quantile probability. To the best of my knowdlegde, there is no standardized way to integrate multiple quantile regression with Sktime/Skpro probabilistic prediction methods such as predict_quantiles/predict_intervals. This PR adds new Skpro regressor that wraps multiple quantile regressors and supports probabilistic predictions from wrapped regressors.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For quantile regression, often more than one quantile probability is of interest. However, existing Sklearn compatible quantile regressors always fit and predict a single quantile probability. To the best of my knowdlegde, there is no standardized way to integrate multiple quantile regression with Sktime/Skpro probabilistic prediction methods such as predict_quantiles/predict_intervals.
Describe the solution you'd like
New Skpro regressor that wraps multiple quantile regressors and supports probabilistic predictions from wrapped regressors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None, as the proposed solution is already discussed in Sktime issue sktime/sktime#5357
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: