You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In slides-evaluation-generr.tex, the first slide on "GE for a fixed model" is based on a Loss (formally, this definition does not allow for AUC).
Later, you introduced $\rho$ and use this notation to define the "GE for inducer" so that it allows for perf. measures such as AUC but why not already introducing this in the first slide when you explain the GE for a fixed model? You could directly introduce $\rho$ in the very beginning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In slides-evaluation-generr.tex, the first slide on "GE for a fixed model" is based on a Loss (formally, this definition does not allow for AUC).$\rho$ and use this notation to define the "GE for inducer" so that it allows for perf. measures such as AUC but why not already introducing this in the first slide when you explain the GE for a fixed model? You could directly introduce $\rho$ in the very beginning.
Later, you introduced
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: