We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
curl http://localhost:5000/requests/time_to_close.json?count=7&service_code=4fd3b167e750846744000005&end_date=2013-05-16 { "WardData": { "0": { "Time": 0.00974537037037037, "Count": 1 }, "1": { "Time": 9.006513941099538, "Count": 133 }, "10": { "Time": 1.509606963738426, "Count": 72 }, …
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes. Some SR come through with nil wards, and those are attributed to ward 0 in the daily counts. The value should be discarded or ignored.
Is this breaking something?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Sandor Weisz [email protected]:
curl http://localhost:5000/requests/time_to_close.json?count=7&service_code=4fd3b167e750846744000005&end_date=2013-05-16 { "WardData": { "0": { "Time": 0.00974537037037037, "Count": 1 }, "1": { "Time": 9.006513941099538, "Count": 133 }, "10": { "Time": 1.509606963738426, "Count": 72 }, — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/170 .
curl http://localhost:5000/requests/time_to_close.json?count=7&service_code=4fd3b167e750846744000005&end_date=2013-05-16
{ "WardData": { "0": { "Time": 0.00974537037037037, "Count": 1 }, "1": { "Time": 9.006513941099538, "Count": 133 }, "10": { "Time": 1.509606963738426, "Count": 72 },
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/170 .
[email protected]
Sorry, something went wrong.
It is. Should I strip out the 0th ward on the front-end?
Yes, Ignore it there. Keep this open as a reminder to me to remove it from the JSON, but it's not a blocker.
Done in 637b62d
cgansen
No branches or pull requests
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: