You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, for sockeye spawning upstream of rearing likes, the model in main is:
Suitable upstream segments were modeled as spawning habitat if they were directly connected to (rearing) lakes or to modeled Sockeye Salmon spawning segments (i.e., directly upstream of another spawning segment).
This constraint was mistake/mis-interpretion in the initial creation of the model.
As a preliminary fix for PSF, In branch psf, there is no constraint at all - any suitable stream upstream of a rearing lake is included as spawning habitat.
CWF (Nick L) provides this guidance for something in between:
So, I think using the maximum known upstream distance (so far it is 4.7 km) is appropriate for all Sockeye Salmon streams. This might mean that extra spawning habitat is identified in areas where fish rarely push past more suitable spawning habitat closer to spawning lakes, but even then there is some potential value in managing or reconnecting the additional habitat (e.g., it may be used in high abundance years). I am equally open to using a lower value if an analysis of maximum distances reveals outliers, but most observations are within X km of rearing lakes.
todo:
confirm max known upstream distance
make change in sockeye model
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, for sockeye spawning upstream of rearing likes, the model in
main
is:This constraint was mistake/mis-interpretion in the initial creation of the model.
As a preliminary fix for PSF, In branch
psf
, there is no constraint at all - any suitable stream upstream of a rearing lake is included as spawning habitat.CWF (Nick L) provides this guidance for something in between:
todo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: