Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add argument to fwa_watershedatmeasure to exclude fundamental watershed with measure #66

Open
joethorley opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@joethorley
Copy link

Currently fwa_watershedatmeasure uses a hard to predict in advance algorithm to determine whether to keep, drop, cut or other the fundamental watershed that the upstream measure falls with in.

It would be useful if the user could specify whether to keep or drop the fundamental watershed or revert to the current algorithm.

@smnorris
Copy link
Owner

Good idea. Lots of open issues for this function, it could use some work.

@smnorris smnorris added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants