diff --git a/docs/utilities.adoc b/docs/utilities.adoc
index aa2eae071a..2627eeb24d 100644
--- a/docs/utilities.adoc
+++ b/docs/utilities.adoc
@@ -37,3 +37,91 @@ include::{sourcedir}/utilities/MutableClockDocSpec.groovy[tag=age-filter-spec]
 
 There are many more ways to modify `MutableClock` just have a look at the JavaDocs, or the test code `spock.util.time.MutableClockSpec`.
 
+[[async-conditions]]
+== Evaluating conditions asynchronously with `AsyncConditions`
+
+The utility class `AsyncConditions` can be helpful when working with asynchronous assertions. These are assertions made
+from a different thread than the one running the test, for example when working with callback functions.
+The individual assertions are collected using the `evaluate` method, and in the asserting block, e.g. `then`, the
+`await` method is called to verify the results, blocking until a timeout expires, and failing if any of the evaluations
+failed.
+The timeout in seconds can be specified as a parameter, see the example below. The default is `1.0` seconds.
+Additionally, the number of expected evaluations must be provided initially, the default value is `1`.
+
+NOTE: In order to use implicit assertions, a typed instance of this class must be declared. When declaring an untyped
+instance (using the `def` keyword), it is required to explicitly `assert` all statements inside the block (see example
+below).
+
+=== Example
+
+.Test
+[source,groovy,indent=0]
+----
+include::{sourcedir}/utilities/concurrent/AsyncConditionsDocSpec.groovy[tag=async-conditions-spec]
+----
+<1> create a default `AsyncConditions` object (expecting a single evaluation)
+<2> A new thread is created, and code is passed to be run from it. This could also happen implicitly, when working with
+a method expecting a callback parameter.
+<3> Pass any code that wants to do assertions to the `evaluate` method. Because we declared the instance of
+`AsyncConditions` using the `def` keyword, we have to use `assert` explicitly.
+<4> finally, call the `await` method
+
+<5> Create an `AsyncConditions` object (expecting three evaluations). This time we are using a statically typed
+instance.
+<6> Call `evaluate` multiple times. Using a typed instance above allows using implicit assertions (no `assert` keyword).
+keyword.
+<7> call `await` in the end, specifying 2.5 seconds as the timeout
+
+[[polling-conditions]]
+== Polling until conditions are fulfilled with `PollingConditions`
+
+The `PollingConditions` utility can be used to (repeatedly) check on asynchronous conditions. The difference compared to
+`AsyncConditions` is that the result is obtained passively, there is no `await` method.
+`PollingConditions` allows to configure the timeout, delay and a delay increasing factor for the checks. Any number of
+code blocks are passed to the `eventually` method, which will evaluate them, according to given time parameters, and
+either pass or throw one of the appropriate Spock exceptions.
+The `within` method can be used to override the timeout for a single invocation. See the second example below for a more
+complicated use case.
+
+NOTE: The same restriction when using the `def` keyword exists here also, see the note on `AsyncConditions`
+
+=== Example
+
+.Test
+[source,groovy,indent=0]
+----
+include::{sourcedir}/utilities/concurrent/PollingConditionsDocSpec.groovy[tag=polling-conditions-spec]
+----
+<1> create a `PollingConditions` object
+<2> values are set to variables in an asynchronous way
+<3> block(s) of code containing assertions, passed in a `when` step
+<4> verify the result by checking for exceptions
+<5> Override the timeout for a single invocation. Using `expect` (or `then`) here forces immediate evaluation.
+<6> only the first failed evaluation will be reported
+
+[[blocking-variables]]
+== Evaluating asynchronous variables with `BlockingVariable` and `BlockingVariables`
+
+The two utility classes `BlockingVariable` and `BlockingVariables` are there to help with collecting variables that are
+written asynchronously, e.g. from another thread. Reading the variable(s) will block the current thread until a value is
+available and returned or the timeout is reached.
+For a single variable, a type parameter can be provided, see the example below.
+An instance of `BlockingVariables` allows setting properties to it dynamically, and comparisons (i.e. assertions) can be
+made for the individual properties, accessing them by their name.
+The maximum amount of seconds to wait for can be specified as a parameter, the default is `1.0` seconds.
+
+=== Example
+
+.Test
+[source,groovy,indent=0]
+----
+include::{sourcedir}/utilities/concurrent/BlockingVariablesDocSpec.groovy[tag=blocking-variables-spec]
+----
+<1> create a `BlockingVariable` object, providing an optional type parameter
+<2> A new thread is created, and immediately put to sleep for some time. Afterwards it will set the value.
+<3> The value is accessed via the `get` method. This happens immediately, as the main thread is never interrupted. The
+method will block until the value is available.
+
+<4> create a `BlockingVariables` object for multiple variables, providing an optional timeout
+<5> set values for `foo`, `bar` and `baz` at some point in the future
+<6> compare the individual properties, blocking this thread until they are available
diff --git a/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/AsyncConditionsDocSpec.groovy b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/AsyncConditionsDocSpec.groovy
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cf50092444
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/AsyncConditionsDocSpec.groovy
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+package org.spockframework.docs.utilities.concurrent
+
+import spock.lang.Specification
+import spock.util.concurrent.AsyncConditions
+
+class AsyncConditionsDocSpec extends Specification {
+
+  // tag::async-conditions-spec[]
+  def "example of single passing explicit evaluation"() {
+    def conditions = new AsyncConditions()          // <1>
+
+    when:
+    Thread.start {          // <2>
+      conditions.evaluate {          //<3>
+        assert true
+      }
+    }
+
+    then:
+    conditions.await()          // <4>
+  }
+
+  def "example of multiple passing implicit evaluations"() {
+    AsyncConditions conditions = new AsyncConditions(3)          // <5>
+
+    when:
+    Thread.start {
+      conditions.evaluate {          // <6>
+        true
+        true
+      }
+      conditions.evaluate {          // <6>
+        true
+      }
+    }
+
+    and:
+    Thread.start {
+      conditions.evaluate {          // <6>
+        true
+      }
+    }
+
+    then:
+    conditions.await(2.5)          // <7>
+  }
+  // end::async-conditions-spec[]
+}
diff --git a/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/BlockingVariablesDocSpec.groovy b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/BlockingVariablesDocSpec.groovy
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5be4bd6088
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/BlockingVariablesDocSpec.groovy
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+package org.spockframework.docs.utilities.concurrent
+
+import spock.lang.Specification
+import spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariable
+import spock.util.concurrent.BlockingVariables
+
+class BlockingVariablesDocSpec extends Specification {
+
+  // tag::blocking-variables-spec[]
+  def "single variable is read before it is written"() {
+    def list = new BlockingVariable<List<Integer>>()          // <1>
+
+    when:
+    Thread.start {
+      Thread.sleep(25)          // <2>
+      println "calling set"
+      list.set([1, 2, 3])
+    }
+
+    then:
+    println "calling get, blocking"
+    list.get() == [1, 2, 3]          // <3>
+  }
+
+  def "example of multiple variables"() {
+    def vars = new BlockingVariables(2.0)          // <4>
+
+    when:
+    Thread.start {
+      Thread.sleep(50)          // <5>
+      println "setting bar and baz"
+      vars.bar = 2
+      vars.baz = 3
+    }
+    Thread.start {
+      Thread.sleep(25)          // <5>
+      println "setting foo"
+      vars.foo = 1
+    }
+
+    then:
+    println "before comparison, blocking"
+    vars.foo == 1          // <6>
+    vars.bar == 2
+    vars.baz == 3
+  }
+  // end::blocking-variables-spec[]
+}
diff --git a/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/PollingConditionsDocSpec.groovy b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/PollingConditionsDocSpec.groovy
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000..8d0e57ae21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spock-specs/src/test/groovy/org/spockframework/docs/utilities/concurrent/PollingConditionsDocSpec.groovy
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+package org.spockframework.docs.utilities.concurrent
+
+import org.spockframework.runtime.ConditionNotSatisfiedError
+import org.spockframework.runtime.SpockTimeoutError
+import spock.lang.Specification
+import spock.util.concurrent.PollingConditions
+
+class PollingConditionsDocSpec extends Specification {
+  // tag::polling-conditions-spec[]
+  PollingConditions conditions = new PollingConditions()          // <1>
+
+  volatile int num = 0
+  volatile String str = null
+
+  def "time controls and their default values"() {
+    expect:
+    with(conditions) {
+      timeout == 1
+      initialDelay == 0
+      delay == 0.1
+      factor == 1
+    }
+  }
+
+  def "succeeds if all conditions are eventually satisfied"() {
+
+    when:
+    Thread.start {
+      num = 42
+      sleep(25)          // <2>
+      str = "hello"
+    }
+
+    then:
+    conditions.eventually {          // <3>
+      num == 42
+    }
+
+    and:
+    conditions.eventually {          // <3>
+      str == "hello"
+    }
+
+    and:
+    noExceptionThrown()          // <4>
+  }
+
+  def "fails if any condition isn't satisfied in time"() {
+
+    given:
+    Thread.start {
+      num = 42
+      sleep(25) // milliseconds     <2>
+      str = "hello"
+    }
+
+    expect:
+    conditions.within(0.05) { // seconds     <5>
+      num == 42
+    }
+
+    when:
+    conditions.eventually {          // <3>
+      num == 0
+      str == "bye"
+    }
+
+    then:
+    def error = thrown(SpockTimeoutError)
+    error.cause.message.contains('num == 0')          // <6>
+  }
+  // end::polling-conditions-spec[]
+}