Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
163 lines (120 loc) · 7.48 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

163 lines (120 loc) · 7.48 KB
Raw

I. Overview

This suite supports evaluation of the output of diarization systems relative to a gold standard subject to the following assumptions:

  • both reference and system diarizations are saved as RTTM files
  • within an RTTM file, for any two recordings the sets of speakers are disjoint

II. Dependencies

The following are required to run this software:

III. Metrics

Diarization error rate

Following tradition in this area, we report diarization error rate (DER), which is the sum of

  • speaker error -- percentage of scored time for which the wrong speaker id is assigned within a speech region
  • false alarm speech -- percentage of scored time for which a nonspeech region is incorrectly marked as containing speech
  • missed speech -- percentage of scored time for which a speech region is incorrectly marked as not containing speech

As with word error rate, a score of zero indicates perfect performance and higher scores (which may exceed 100) indicate poorer performance.

Typically, DER is computed using various exclusions, which have the effect of juicing the scores. For instance, systems are not scored within 250 ms of each reference segment boundary, with the effect that segments under 500 ms in duration aren't scored at all. Nor does scoring consider regions of overlapping speech in the reference diarization.

Clustering metrics

An alternate approach to system evaluation is convert both the reference and system outputs to frame-level labels, then evaluate using one of many well-known approaches for evaluating clustering performance. Each recording is converted to a sequence of 10 ms frames, each of which is assigned a single label correponding to one of the following cases:

  • the frame contains no speech
  • the frame contains speech from a single speaker (one label per speaker indentified)
  • the frame contains overlapping speech (one label for each element in the powerset of speakers)

These frame-level labelings are then scored with the following metrics:

Goodman-Kruskal tau

Goodman-Kruskal tau is an asymmetric association measure dating back to work by Leo Goodman and William Kruskal in the 1950s (Goodman and Kruskal, 1954). For a reference labeling ref and a system labeling ref, GKT(ref, sys) corresponds to the fraction of variability in ref that can be explained by sys. Consequently, GKT(ref, sys) is 1 when ref is perfectly predictive of sys and 0 when it is not predictive at all. Correspondingly, GKT(sys, ref) is 1 when sys is perfectly predictive of ref and 0 when lacking any predictive power.

B-cubed precision, recall, and F1

The B-cubed precision for a single frame assigned speaker S in the reference diarization and C in the system diarization is the proportion of frames assigned C that are also assigned S. Similarly, the B-cubed recall for a frame is the proportion of all frames assigned S that are also assigned C. The overall precision and recall, then, are just the mean of the frame-level precision and recall measures and the overall F-1 their harmonic mean. For additional details see Bagga and Baldwin (1998).

Information theoretic measures

We report three information theoretic measures:

  • conditional entropy of the reference labeling given the system labeling (bits)
  • mutual information between the reference and system labelings (bits)
  • normalized mutual information between the reference and system labelings (bits)

IV. Scoring a single file

To evaluate system output stored in an RTTM file sys.rttm against a corresponding gold standard RTTM ref.rttm:

python score.py ref.rttm sys.rttm

which will calculate and report the following metrics:

  • diarization error rate (DER)
  • B-cubed precision
  • B-cubed recall
  • B-cubed F1
  • Goodman-Kruskal tau in the direction of the reference diarization to the system diarization (GKT(ref, sys))
  • Goodman-Kruskal tau in the direction of the system diarization to the reference diarization (GKT(sys, ref))
  • conditional entropy of the reference diarization given the system diarization in bits (H(ref|sys))
  • mutual information in bits (MI)
  • normalized mutual information (NMI)

In this VM, as a simple selftest:

~/anaconda/bin/python score.py test_ref/Phil_Crane.rttm test_sys/Phil_Crane.rttm

should produce the output:

DER: 42.30
B-cubed precision: 0.98
B-cubed recall: 0.67
B-cubed F1: 0.80
GKT(ref, sys): 0.60
GKT(sys, ref): 0.96
H(ref|sys): 0.10
MI: 1.68
NMI: 0.79

And the simple python score_batch.py test.df test_ref test_sys should produce an output file test.df containing:

DER	B3Precision	B3Recall	B3F1	TauRefSys	TauSysRef	CE	MI	NMI
Phil_Crane	42.3	0.975590490012551	0.6723380205755907	0.796061934401888	0.5992237728375416	0.9637703404560899	0.10387135721168145	1.6782303644465815	0.7931818752730179

For additional details consult the docstring of score.py.

V. Scoring a batch of files

To evaluate system output stored in RTTM files in the directory sys_dir against reference RTTM files stored in the directory ref_dir and write the output to a file scores.df:

python score_batch.py scores.df ref_dir sys_dir

This will scan both ref_dir and sys_dir for files with the .rttm extension, score each file found in both directories, and write the scores to a tab-delimited file suitable for reading into R as a dataframe containing the following columns:

  • FID -- the file id
  • DER -- diarization error rate
  • B3Precision -- B-cubed precision
  • B3Recall -- B-cubed recall
  • B3F1 -- B-cubed F1
  • GKTRefSys -- Goodman-Kruskal tau in the direction of the reference diarization to the system diarization
  • GKTSysRef -- Goodman-Kruskal tau in the direction of the system diarization to the reference diarization
  • HRefSys -- conditional entropy of the reference diarization given the system diarization (bits)
  • MI -- mutual information (bits)
  • NMI -- normalized mutual information (bits)

Alternately, the file ids could have been specified explicitly via a script file of ids (one per line) using the -S flag:

python score_batch.py -S all.scp scores.df ref_dir sys_dir

For additional details consult the docstring of score.py.

VI. Printing confusion matrix for a single file

To print the confusion matrix between the frame-level labeling corresponding to a system RTTM file sys.rttm and a corresponding gold standard RTTM ref.rttm:

python confusion_matrix.py ref.rttm sys.rttm

By default this will output raw frequencies so that the i,j-th cell contains the total number of times that the i-th reference class was assigned to the j-th system class. Alternately, the --norm flag may be invoked so that each row is normalized to sum to 1:

python confusion_matrix.py --norm ref.rttm sys.rttm

VII. References

  • Bagga, A. and Baldwin, B. (1998). "Algorithms for scoring coreference chains." Proceedings of LREC 1998.
  • Goodman, L.A. and Kruskal, W.H. (1954). "Measures of association for cross classifications." Journal of the American Statistical Association.
  • Pearson, R. (2016). GoodmanKruskal: Association Analysis for Categorical Variables. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=GoodmanKruskal.