Replies: 3 comments
-
Can you just forward the localhost port that stash runs on to your local machine? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I really really do not advise exposing Stash to the open web. You are literally asking for problems. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hello.
Yes, I just realized that when my ubiquity system said "we do not recommend
opening a port".
They suggested using a VPN like "WireGuard". I'll do that.
Thank you for your responses. :)
…On Thu, Nov 16, 2023, 00:34 JuiceBox ***@***.***> wrote:
I really *really* do not advise exposing Stash to the open web. You are
literally asking for problems.
Instead, consider accessing Stash via a VPN connection that gives you
access to your local network.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4272 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AR5KRPQDZ6RNKSNMYK2LMT3YEWQWZAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7DDWDCGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TKOBUGIYDG>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello.
I'm trying to make Stash accessibly from the Web and .. I'm just lost
First: I could do it on my old synology NAS without much problem
Second: Yes, I added a user ID/password and remove the line I was suposed to remove in the config file to allow the access from the web
My problem, I think is more from QNAP/ Contenair station / Docker
I followed these steps: https://www.qnap.com/en/how-to/tutorial/article/how-to-configure-the-default-web-url-port-for-containers-and-applications-in-container-station-3
But, I don't gat any "Web URL" and my port forwarding is stuck on 9999 --> 9999TCP even if I changed the port.
Any idea ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions