Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux specific regression -- error: cannot inherit from class 'NSLock' because it has overridable members that could not be loaded #5108

Open
clackary opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #5109
Labels

Comments

@clackary
Copy link

The following code snippet builds successfully with the 2024-07-15 nightly toolchain, but fails to build with 2024-07-22. I'm not sure how to check or verify this was caused by the switch to swift-foundation, but the timing seems to line up.

import Foundation

class FooLock: NSLock {}

Actual behavior:

/project/repro.swift:3:7: error: cannot inherit from class 'NSLock' because it has overridable members that could not be loaded
1 | import Foundation
2 | 
3 | class FooLock: NSLock {}
  |       |- error: cannot inherit from class 'NSLock' because it has overridable members that could not be loaded
  |       `- note: could not deserialize 'mutex'
4 | 

Worth noting that it does seem specific to Linux, because the same snippet builds successfully with recent toolchains on macOS.

Expected behavior:
Code builds successfully.

Configuration:
OS: Linux Ubuntu 22.04
Toolchain: swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2024-07-22-a-ubuntu22.04-aarch64 or newer

@clackary
Copy link
Author

clackary commented Sep 17, 2024

I've been working on bisecting this between the 07-15 and 07-22 toolchains, and I've been able to build the 07-15 swiftlang sources (but it did require a cherry-pick of b7ec9c84. I'm using the buildbot_linux preset, which looks like it includes both --foundation and --install-foundation flags.

The problem is that after the compiler is built, I go to compile the reproducer, and it fails with error: no such module 'Foundation'.

Am I missing some kind of link step to make sure the newly built Foundation is discoverable?

cc @parkera @jmschonfeld

@daltonclaybrook
Copy link

I'm seeing this issue as well with NSThread

@parkera parkera transferred this issue from swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation Sep 27, 2024
@parkera
Copy link
Contributor

parkera commented Sep 27, 2024

Moving this issue to the compiler repo, since it seems like the investigation should continue in that space.

@clackary
Copy link
Author

clackary commented Oct 2, 2024

Bump. Has this landed on anyone specific for triage? Anything I can do to help on my end?

@xymus
Copy link
Contributor

xymus commented Oct 14, 2024

The note points to the mutex member being unreadable from the client side. From the NSLock sources it looks like mutex can’t be read because its type relies on pthread_mutex_t which comes from an @_implementationOnly dependency. Using @_implementationOnly in a non-resilient module is unsupported and strongly discouraged, it can cause this kind of unreliable behavior without being detectable by the compiler.

@clackary (Hi!) as a workaround, importing CoreFoundation from the client should force loading that module and allow to read mutex. On my local Linux machine it allows the reducer to build.

@parkera this will need a fix in the swift-corelibs-foundation project. Can we make sure the type of NSLock.mutex doesn’t rely on anything behind an @_implementationOnly import?

@parkera
Copy link
Contributor

parkera commented Oct 14, 2024

Please don't import CoreFoundation on Linux. It is (supposed to be) an implementation detail.

@parkera
Copy link
Contributor

parkera commented Oct 14, 2024

Will switching to internal import fix this?

@xymus
Copy link
Contributor

xymus commented Oct 14, 2024

Yes adopting internal import should work here.

@parkera parkera transferred this issue from swiftlang/swift Oct 14, 2024
parkera added a commit to parkera/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2024
@parkera
Copy link
Contributor

parkera commented Oct 14, 2024

I'd like to double check with some people before we merge it -- but I put up a PR for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants