You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The main reason for this is that categorizations can help to better understand and reference the different OSPOs created by looking at their motivators. For instance, there are certain topics relevant to corporate OSPOs that are completely out of the scope of other OSPOs created within universities or governments, and vice versa. Having a set of basic categories for people to use can help to differentiate and find similarities in OSPOs being established across sectors.
Creating this issue to follow up on the conversation raised by @lhawthorn #9 (comment)
Background:
The main reason for this is that categorizations can help to better understand and reference the different OSPOs created by looking at their motivators. For instance, there are certain topics relevant to corporate OSPOs that are completely out of the scope of other OSPOs created within universities or governments, and vice versa. Having a set of basic categories for people to use can help to differentiate and find similarities in OSPOs being established across sectors.
This comes from a past issue discussion on categories started in OSPOlogy repo: todogroup/ospology#261 and was also implemented in the ospo-book project in the taxonomy section, reviewed by contributors of the project: https://github.com/todogroup/ospology/blob/main/ospo-book/chapters/taxonomy.md
Action Items:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: