The umbracoUser table is using the primary key name PK_user instead of PK_umbracoUser

[pschwarzkopf]

Which Umbraco version are you using? (Please write the exact version, example: 10.1.0)

14.3.0

Bug summary

The table "umbracoUser" is using the primary key name "PK_user" instead of "PK_umbracoUser".

Umbraco-CMS/src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/Dtos/UserDto.cs

Line 22 in e4dbf4c

[PrimaryKeyColumn(Name = "PK_user")]

Other tables use a prefixed primary key (example: the table "umbracoUserGroup" is using the primary key name "PK_umbracoUserGroup").

Umbraco-CMS/src/Umbraco.Infrastructure/Persistence/Dtos/UserGroupDto.cs

Line 22 in e4dbf4c

[PrimaryKeyColumn(IdentitySeed = 6)]

Specifics

This caused an issue with an existing application (with a user table already existing), when adding Umbraco.

Steps to reproduce

Create a user table with the primary key name PK_User, then try to add Umbraco to the application.

Expected result / actual result

No response

[github-actions]

Hi there @pschwarzkopf!

Firstly, a big thank you for raising this issue. Every piece of feedback we receive helps us to make Umbraco better.

We really appreciate your patience while we wait for our team to have a look at this but we wanted to let you know that we see this and share with you the plan for what comes next.

• We'll assess whether this issue relates to something that has already been fixed in a later version of the release that it has been raised for.
• If it's a bug, is it related to a release that we are actively supporting or is it related to a release that's in the end-of-life or security-only phase?
• We'll replicate the issue to ensure that the problem is as described.
• We'll decide whether the behavior is an issue or if the behavior is intended.

We wish we could work with everyone directly and assess your issue immediately but we're in the fortunate position of having lots of contributions to work with and only a few humans who are able to do it. We are making progress though and in the meantime, we will keep you in the loop and let you know when we have any questions.

Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂

[NguyenThuyLan]

Hi @pschwarzkopf , thank you for reporting the issue.
I think you are not forced to use Umbraco in the same database as the rest of your application.
And you have another way to resolve it.
Editing key name could have many affects so we don't consider to fix it now.