You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Network history takes 1.7 TB on the disk space - compression not possible because segments are already compressed)
The core is catching up quickly, but the data node is not catching up so quickly. See the graph below(diff between core and data-node) - It goes down very slowly:
Network history snapshot creation takes a very long time. If We sum network history copy time for all tables it is spending 100% of time copying data from PostgreSQL to the network history - so it has little time to catch up. See the graph for api0.vega.community and api2(it has less data both in the DB and the network history)
Who is affected?
All people with full network history and archival node.
How to mitigate
Move to faster disks (not always possible- especially in clouds. Sometimes it is very expensive)
Disable network history publishing segments - It will create a gap in the network history and make it useless on the specific node)
Observed behaviour
The data node is not able to catch up because copying data from the database to network history takes too much time.
Expected behaviour
Data-node should catch up quicker.
Steps to reproduce
N/A
Software version
v0.7.10
Failing test
No response
Jenkins run
No response
Configuration used
No response
Relevant log output
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem encountered
Let's assume We have:
The core is catching up quickly, but the data node is not catching up so quickly. See the graph below(diff between core and data-node) - It goes down very slowly:
Network history snapshot creation takes a very long time. If We sum network history copy time for all tables it is spending 100% of time copying data from PostgreSQL to the network history - so it has little time to catch up. See the graph for api0.vega.community and api2(it has less data both in the DB and the network history)
Who is affected?
All people with full network history and archival node.
How to mitigate
Observed behaviour
The data node is not able to catch up because copying data from the database to network history takes too much time.
Expected behaviour
Data-node should catch up quicker.
Steps to reproduce
Software version
v0.7.10
Failing test
No response
Jenkins run
No response
Configuration used
No response
Relevant log output
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: