We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Listing all allowlists looks correct... picking a random validator and grepping out their allows here:
$ wormchaind query wormhole list-allowlists | grep -B2 wormhole1eg9kajxr5x25h0t94570mn79j3a00emphnwt3p - allowed_address: wormhole1jyxc28f8m0h7uz5zwqxc0s6p5za7eu30xnrmq8 name: ChainodeRelay validator_address: wormhole1eg9kajxr5x25h0t94570mn79j3a00emphnwt3p -- - allowed_address: wormhole1qf0p0pvkznqtwrdwyp3p9ymuhjv3cvyrqq8r6p name: ChainodeAcc validator_address: wormhole1eg9kajxr5x25h0t94570mn79j3a00emphnwt3p
I would have expected similar output when running the following command for that same specific validator -- but it gives something strange:
$ wormchaind query wormhole show-allowlist wormhole1eg9kajxr5x25h0t94570mn79j3a00emphnwt3p allowlist: - allowed_address: wormhole1yre8d0ek4vp0wjlec407525zjctq7t32z930fp name: w7-prodops validator_address: wormhole1cm4lqyl5j5t9ewd79vrnsrga2cnml8ca29r0sz - allowed_address: wormhole1yre8d0ek4vp0wjlec407525zjctq7t32z930fp name: w7-prodops validator_address: wormhole1cm4lqyl5j5t9ewd79vrnsrga2cnml8ca29r0sz pagination: null validator_address: wormhole1eg9kajxr5x25h0t94570mn79j3a00emphnwt3p
Bug?
run the above commands
pretty low priority i would think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @mcf-rocks! Looks like the show-allowlist command filters by allowed address instead of validator address. We'll fix this.
show-allowlist
Sorry, something went wrong.
nik-suri
No branches or pull requests
Listing all allowlists looks correct... picking a random validator and grepping out their allows here:
I would have expected similar output when running the following command for that same specific validator -- but it gives something strange:
Bug?
Steps to reproduce
run the above commands
pretty low priority i would think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: