You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't closely followed the discussion since before 2023, but one thing generally missing in the contemporary discussion of 'spam' is the introduction of Miner Extractable Value (MEV) which can corrupt miner incentives.
If, for some reason, someone can extract profit in a secondary way (e.g. frontrun a 'cheap' exchange transaction of non-BTC spam tokens before someone else gets to it), the miners might observe this in the mempool and prefer to confirm one transaction over another (regardless of on-chain-fees) for a more-net-profitable result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I haven't closely followed the discussion since before 2023, but one thing generally missing in the contemporary discussion of 'spam' is the introduction of Miner Extractable Value (MEV) which can corrupt miner incentives.
If, for some reason, someone can extract profit in a secondary way (e.g. frontrun a 'cheap' exchange transaction of non-BTC spam tokens before someone else gets to it), the miners might observe this in the mempool and prefer to confirm one transaction over another (regardless of on-chain-fees) for a more-net-profitable result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: