Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate tarsnap usage #12

Open
mwild1 opened this issue Feb 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate tarsnap usage #12

mwild1 opened this issue Feb 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@mwild1
Copy link
Contributor

mwild1 commented Feb 28, 2021

It seems our Tarsnap usage may have increased recently. It would be good to review what's currently stored, and what we're backing up to help reduce costs.

@Kev
Copy link
Member

Kev commented Feb 28, 2021

From the mailing list:

Anecdotally, it seems that our Tarsnap usage has increased - I added $50
to our account on January 10 and again on February 21. Do we have a
sense of why this would be?

On 25th January the storage used jumped by 40GB (from 70 to 110), taking the daily storage from $0.58 to $0.88, and the > 40GB of data transfer that day cost $10.

So someone did something significant to one of the servers on the 25th Jan, presumably.

Alright, so what happened is that someone (I know who, but they don’t need to be named), on 25th Jan gzipped a load of old sql backups of xmpp.net. This presumably defeated the dedupe that tarsnap does on uncompressed files, and caused an additional 38G to need to be backed up and stored.

/K

@Echolon Echolon added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Jun 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants