You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is an option to improve quality of sound, but it will go with cost of speed (during my tests about 3 times slower - but I have quite fast CPU). This potentially allows to have lower bitrate with the same quality. (I know some people encode books at 256kbps, so it won't be relevant for them), but I prefere to have more books on my phone, so size matters.
I can't hear the difference on most of the audiobooks, but would be interested to hear what community thinks.
As speed of encoding was my ultimate goal, I was focusing more on that.
What to do with speed and quality?
Quality is OK, speed is good enouhg. Change nothing in this area.
6%
I'm fine to spend few more minutes to have better quality/lower bitrate.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
There is an option to improve quality of sound, but it will go with cost of speed (during my tests about 3 times slower - but I have quite fast CPU). This potentially allows to have lower bitrate with the same quality. (I know some people encode books at 256kbps, so it won't be relevant for them), but I prefere to have more books on my phone, so size matters.
I can't hear the difference on most of the audiobooks, but would be interested to hear what community thinks.
As speed of encoding was my ultimate goal, I was focusing more on that.
29 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions