Skip to content

573-pankaj/Breast-Cancer-Prediction-AND-Model-Accuracy-Measurement

Repository files navigation

Breast-Cancer-Prediction-AND-Model-Accuracy-Measurement

Targets_names : array(['malignant', 'benign'], dtype='<U9') DESCR : breast_cancer_dataset:\n\nBreast cancer wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset Data Set Characteristics:**\
Number of Instances: 569\n\n
Number of Attributes: 30 numeric, predictive attributes and the class
Attribute Information:\n - radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)\n - texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)\n - perimeter\n - area\n - smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)\n - compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)\n - concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)\n - concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)\n - symmetry \n - fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)\n\n The mean, standard error, and "worst" or largest (mean of the three\n largest values) of these features were computed for each image,\n resulting in 30 features. For instance, field 3 is Mean Radius, field\n 13 is Radius SE, field 23 is Worst Radius.\n\n - class:\n - WDBC-Malignant\n - WDBC-Benign\n\n Missing Attribute Values: None\n\n :Class Distribution: 212 - Malignant, 357 - Benign\n\n

Accuracy Observation 1.Random Forest predicted accuracy: 0.8512585653455618 training set accuracy : 0.9794283216783217 testing set accuracy : 0.8512585653455618 2.Logistic Regression predicted accuracy: 0.9736842105263158 training set accuracy : 0.9868131868131869 testing set accuracy : 0.9736842105263158 3.Naive Bayes predicted accuracy: 0.9736842105263158 training set accuracy : 0.9362637362637363 testing set accuracy : 0.9736842105263158 4.K-Neighbors Classifier predicted accuracy: 0.9473684210526315 training set accuracy : 0.9802197802197802 testing set accuracy : 0.9473684210526315 Conclusion : comparing the above four model based on the breast cancer data set we observed that all the models performs preety much good , from them LR and NB gives approx. 97 % accuracy and Random Forest gives 85 % and K-Neighbor gives 94 % predicted accuracy which is very good . I also calculate the training set as well as testing set accuracy mentioned above.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published