-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use cmake find_package to find LLVM rather than a custom setup #1279
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -100,19 +100,59 @@ checked_find_package (pugixml 1.8 REQUIRED) | |
|
||
|
||
# LLVM library setup | ||
checked_find_package (LLVM 7.0 REQUIRED | ||
PRINT LLVM_SYSTEM_LIBRARIES CLANG_LIBRARIES) | ||
# ensure include directory is added (in case of non-standard locations | ||
include_directories (BEFORE SYSTEM "${LLVM_INCLUDES}") | ||
link_directories ("${LLVM_LIB_DIR}") | ||
|
||
############ HACK ############## | ||
# On OSX, the Homebrew (and maybe any build) of LLVM 10.0 seems to have a | ||
# link conflict with its dependency on the llvm libc++ and the system | ||
# libc++, both can end up dynamically linked and lead to very subtle and | ||
# frustrating behavior failures (in particular, osl's use of libclang will | ||
# botch include file parsing any time LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't have the llvm | ||
# libc++ first). | ||
# | ||
# It seems that this is not a problem when linking against the llvm and | ||
# libclang libraries statically. So on apple and when LLVM 10+ are involved, | ||
# just force that choice. Other than larger executables, it seems harmless, | ||
# and in any case a better choice than this beastly bug. | ||
Comment on lines
+113
to
+115
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Out of curiosity, have you checked that this is still necessary in the new LLVM 11? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I have not tested this on Mac (and just relied on the github CI). |
||
# | ||
# We can periodically revisit this with new version of LLVM, maybe they will | ||
# fix things and we won't require this preemptive static linking. | ||
if (APPLE AND LLVM_VERSION VERSION_GREATER_EQUAL 10.0) | ||
set (LLVM_STATIC ON) | ||
endif () | ||
|
||
checked_find_package(LLVM REQUIRED CONFIG | ||
HINTS ${LLVM_DIRECTORY}) | ||
|
||
# manual version check because "LLVM is API-compatible only with matching major.minor versions" aka it requires VERSION_EQUAL | ||
if ( ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 7 ) | ||
message(FATAL_ERROR "LLVM 7.0+ is required but ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION} was found") | ||
endif() | ||
|
||
include_directories(BEFORE SYSTEM ${LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS}) | ||
add_definitions(${LLVM_DEFINITIONS}) | ||
link_directories(${LLVM_LIBRARY_DIRS}) | ||
Comment on lines
+131
to
+133
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Are these still necessary to be declared here and therefore be exposed to the whole of the osl code base? Or are exported targets set up correctly by the LLVM config cmake? In other words, should these be deleted, and instead liboslexec and other components should have There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Kinda, for the clang libraries this is trivial. For LLVM itself, it is a bit more complicated. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Currently, OSL doesn't support anything but x86 and NVPTX, but I expect it will need to fairly soon (at the very least, the ARM-based Macs that are coming. |
||
|
||
llvm_map_components_to_libnames(LLVM_LIBRARIES | ||
MCJIT Passes | ||
${LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD}) #this will link with all LLVM targets (x86, nvptx, ...) specific libraries (codegen, dissasembly,...) | ||
|
||
# Extract and concatenate major & minor, remove wayward patches, | ||
# dots, and "svn" or other suffixes. | ||
string (REGEX REPLACE "([0-9]+)\\.([0-9]+).*" "\\1\\2" OSL_LLVM_VERSION ${LLVM_VERSION}) | ||
string (REGEX REPLACE "([0-9]+)\\.([0-9]+).*" "\\1\\2" OSL_LLVM_VERSION ${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION}) | ||
add_definitions (-DOSL_LLVM_VERSION=${OSL_LLVM_VERSION}) | ||
add_definitions (-DOSL_LLVM_FULL_VERSION="${LLVM_VERSION}") | ||
add_definitions (-DOSL_LLVM_FULL_VERSION="${LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION}") | ||
if (LLVM_NAMESPACE) | ||
add_definitions ("-DLLVM_NAMESPACE=${LLVM_NAMESPACE}") | ||
add_definitions ("-DLLVM_NAMESPACE=${LLVM_NAMESPACE}") | ||
endif () | ||
if (NOT LLVM_DIRECTORY) | ||
set(LLVM_DIRECTORY ${LLVM_INSTALL_PREFIX}) | ||
endif() | ||
set(LLVM_TARGETS ${LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD}) | ||
|
||
checked_find_package(Clang REQUIRED) | ||
include_directories(BEFORE SYSTEM ${CLANG_INCLUDE_DIRS}) | ||
set(CLANG_LIBRARIES clangCrossTU) # TODO figure out what exactly we need (this seems to work though it might be overkill) | ||
|
||
if (LLVM_VERSION VERSION_GREATER_EQUAL 10.0.0 AND | ||
CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD VERSION_LESS 14) | ||
message (FATAL_ERROR | ||
|
@@ -135,6 +175,8 @@ if (APPLE AND LLVM_VERSION VERSION_EQUAL 10.0.1 AND EXISTS "/usr/local/Cellar/ll | |
"${ColorReset}\n") | ||
endif () | ||
|
||
|
||
# partio | ||
checked_find_package (partio) | ||
|
||
|
||
|
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you don't mind, let's call this "run-clang-format".
I tend to copy and/or synchronize the more generic cmake scripts between multiple projects, so it's very handy to not have too many project-specific names littering the code like this that could in theory be applied to any project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have zero preference in this so
run-clang-format
is fine