Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes for section about rules priorities #258
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fixes for section about rules priorities #258
Changes from 4 commits
3d03b9f
bf8b347
07522a6
ba9b86b
eeff301
ed4e342
cf42e29
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Теперь как раз надо разделить этот пример на два, эти правила не эквивалентны)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ngorskikh почему не эквивалентны?
вот выдержка из документации:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sfionov Вызываю поддержку с воздуха. В корлибсах нынче эти два правила не эквивалентны: из-за того, что в них нет модификаторов типа запроса, применяются некие типа запроса по-умолчанию (это было сделано не просто так, а по чьему-то строгому указанию, не помню, чьему):
@@||example.com^$elemhide,content,jsinject,urlblock,extension
неявно содержит два типа запроса:DOCUMENT
иSUBDOCUMENT
.@@||example.org^$document
неявно содержит только тип запросаDOCUMENT
. Следовательно, приоритеты у них вычисляются разные. Кто прав, кто виноват, нипонятно :(