Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug/201 rework try block #247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

frida-161
Copy link
Contributor

This should fix the Error mentioned in #201

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #247 (a922660) into master (84de3da) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 10.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #247      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.12%   19.14%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        3708     3709       +1     
  Branches      610      556      -54     
==========================================
+ Hits          709      710       +1     
  Misses       2947     2947              
  Partials       52       52              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...plication_schema_toolbox/gui/import_gmlas_panel.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...lication_schema_toolbox/core/load_gmlas_in_qgis.py 81.81% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️

@Guts Guts added the bug Houston, we've a problem! label Oct 7, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@Guts Guts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rebase your branch before I merge it?

@frida-161
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @Guts, I hope the rebase worked :)

@Guts Guts merged commit 79c2ba8 into BRGM:master Oct 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Houston, we've a problem!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants