-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cRPA Screening and external RPA corrections #119
Conversation
…ulting from cRPA in clusters.
… for screened interactions, in orbitally invariant manner.
…default to not include irreducible polarisability.
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #119 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
=======================================
Files 138 139 +1
Lines 18372 18645 +273
=======================================
- Misses 18372 18645 +273
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
LGTM |
Can we add an mRPA example for solids? e.g. a minimal Graphene cell based on what was done in the paper, including the bare and screened correlation functions? |
Use of mRPA with specifically graphene actually requires functionality in the next PR (use of non-PSD cderis with RIRPA). I have an example ready to go with that after this is merged. |
This adds support for cRPA screening of fragment interactions into Vayesta.
Various varieties of cRPA are possible. By default the conventional approach screening all interactions in the cluster via the screening equation is used; two phenomenological modifications are also supported (screening only the occupied-virtual interactions to avoid unintended reference modifications, and incorporating a term originating from the irreducible polarisability into the coupling of the cRPA to the cluster).
Thing left to do: