Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deploy 1.2.0 #328

Closed
wants to merge 37 commits into from
Closed

Deploy 1.2.0 #328

wants to merge 37 commits into from

Conversation

nknguyenhc
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

Deploy 1.2.0

Proposed Commit Message:

Deploy 1.2.0

Arif-Khalid and others added 30 commits March 4, 2024 12:02
Making releases is done via a manual call
to Version Deployment workflow

This can be further streamlined by deployment
on push to a deploy branch

Let's change workflow behavior to run on push
to a deploy branch
Title filter is handled outside of filters service

This violates the responsibility of the filters service

Let's refactor the search filter to use the filters service
Npm run test will break if the import statement 
for zone-testing is not at the top of test.ts file. 

Let's reorder the import statement and disable
tslint rule for test.ts file.
The method in issue sorter has been updated.

Let's refactor the test cases to match the changes.
The test cases for the user service are outdated. 

Let's refactor test cases for user service.
The test cases for the label filter bar component are outdated. 

Let's refactor test cases for label filter bar component
Refactor and add test cases for phase service

Phase service has been updated. 

Let's refactor and add test cases to match the changes.
pre-push hook that runs `npm run test` automatically 
ensures all tests pass locally, enhancing code quality 
and preventing the accidental push of failing code.

Let's enable the pre-push hook.
We store milestones by number.

This works when filters are confined to one repo, but
doesn't make sense when saving filters across repos.

Let's refactor the milestones to save by title instead
of number
Changelogs are not properly formatted by release-drafter when making new releases.

This is prone to human error and wastes developer resources.

Let's follow the example of CATcher and implement release changelog
automation for WATcher.
No way to keep filters when changing repos.

An option to keep the common filters will be useful for anyone
managing multiple repositories without the hassle of reapplying 
the same filters.

Let's add a checkbox to the change repo dialog allowing 
users to keep their filters.
The concept of "Phase" is inherited from CATcher. Instead of "Phase", 
WATcher provides different "Views" of contributions in a repository.

Let's replace "Phase" with "View".
Column pagination arrows cause unnecessary clogs
if they are disabled.

We hide arrows on columns that only has one page.
Currently, there is no tool tip for the Hidden Users mat-card.
It is not immediately obvious what the column is referring to.

Let's add a tool tip to make it more explanatory.

Co-authored-by: Misra Aditya <[email protected]>
Implement GroupBy feature to allow users to group the issues/prs
based on different criteria such as milestone, status and etc.

Let's set up the Grouping Strategy and Service.
Previously, each label only has 2 states, either selected or
not selected. However, with such design,
the feature of hiding labels can be confused
with hiding issues/PRs with the label.

We implement the three-state label filters,
so that each label can also be used to hide
issues/PRs with the label.
We implement checkboxes for status, so that
multiple types of PRs/issues can be viewed concurrently.
Implement GroupBy feature to allow users to group the issues/prs
based on different criteria such as milestone, status and etc.

Let's integrate the grouping service in the components.
Milestones are not saved even when filters are kept.

This is inconsistent with the meaning of keeping filters.

Let's implement keeping milestones across repos.
WATcher's default view displays issues and pull requests based solely on
their assignees. Grouping issues and pull requests based on their
associated milestones may provide another useful view for the user.

Let's implement the "Group by Milestone" feature.
Co-authored-by: Misra Aditya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nguyen <[email protected]>
With groupby parameters in the URL, users can easily share 
the current grouping by using the URL.

Let's implement initialization with URL parameters and 
the ability to set groupby parameters.
Co-authored-by: Misra Aditya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nknguyenhc <[email protected]>
Currently, there are a lot of options of filters,
but there are no suggested useful preset views.

We add preset views for users to choose from,
and via a button on the header.
GroupingContextService is being reset when the "keep filter" 
option is selected.

Let's check if the "keep filter" option is selected before
resetting the service.
NereusWB922 and others added 7 commits March 29, 2024 22:28
Special milestone groups are not added in the parseMilestoneData
method.

Let's add the special milestone groups to the result of the getGroups
method.
IssueViewer's repository is not updated when navigating back or forward
in the URL history. This will lead to inconsistency between the URL
parameters and the application state.

Let's ensure that IssueViewer's repository is updated on back and forward
navigation.
When there are no milestones in the repo,
the issue viewer shows nothing.

Change is made so that if there is no milestone
in the milestone service, do not apply the milestone filter.
Enabling automate testing in GitHub Actions with enhanced 
code quality of the codebase.

Let's enable automate testing.
Filters cannot be shared to among users.

Users might want to share their current view
to others, consisting of their current filters.

Let's pull and store filters in the URL to allow
sharing of filter combinations.
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Goh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arif Khalid <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: NereusWB922 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: AdityaMisra <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Misra Aditya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vignesh Sankar Iyer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants