Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unirec++ - fix checkDataTypeCompatibility for non-array values #232

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

SiskaPavel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 30, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.00%. Comparing base (ca2b475) to head (e9ff26f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #232   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.00%   85.00%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines          20       20           
  Branches        2        2           
=======================================
  Hits           17       17           
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials        1        1           
Flag Coverage Δ
tests 85.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SiskaPavel SiskaPavel merged commit ee33107 into master Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@SiskaPavel SiskaPavel deleted the unirec++-unirec-record-fix branch September 30, 2024 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants