Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove byteBuffer type (use array of bytes) #121

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

gunnar-mb
Copy link
Collaborator

It wasn't really implemented in several places anyway, but this removes some remaining references to this type.

The byteBuffer type is superfluous since it can be represented by an array of uint8. It was at an earlier time also removed from the VSS project. Another alternative is the IFEX 'opaque' type. It was conceived to indicate that something in reality has structure but that it cannot (or is chosen not to) have a detailed represented in the IFEX description. An Opaque type is presumably also transferred as "just a bunch of bytes" in a computing system - only the name infers there is some additional meaning.

Note: These are older commits that were not written during MBition employment.

It wasn't really implemented in several places anyway, but this
removes some remaining references to this type.

The byteBuffer type is superfluous since it can be represented
by an array of uint8.  It was at an earlier time also removed from the
VSS project.  Another alternative is the IFEX 'opaque' type. It was
conceived to indicate that something in reality has structure but that
it cannot (or is chosen not to) have a detailed represented in the IFEX
description.  An Opaque type is presumably also transferred as "just a
bunch of bytes" in a computing system - only the name infers there is
some additional meaning.

Signed-off-by: Gunnar Andersson <gunnar_dev@[email protected]>
@gunnar-mb gunnar-mb merged commit 08d92c5 into COVESA:master Jun 18, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant