Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a library comparison table to the README #96

Closed

Conversation

NebelNidas
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@NebelNidas NebelNidas added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Mar 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@modmuss50 modmuss50 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No.

Im not a fan of these comparison tables, I dont think this is needed. Maybe just say what mapping-io can do without trying to throw shade towards the other libraries.

@modmuss50 modmuss50 closed this Mar 8, 2024
@NebelNidas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

NebelNidas commented Mar 8, 2024

This was in no way intended to de-legitimize other people's work, rather as a quick and easy way to help consumers make informed decisions on which library to use, based on the feature sets they desire. This table addresses MIO's shortcomings just as much as as the alternatives'.

@SpaceWalkerRS
Copy link

should something like this not be somewhere independent of the libraries it's comparing, to avoid the impression of bias?

@NebelNidas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I guess I could put it on the wiki, but all that would do is make it less discoverable. I don't see an issue with this frankly, I tried to be as neutral as possible. Mapping-IO checking more boxes than the alternatives is simply a consequence of having the largest feature set 🤷‍♂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants