Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eficent 11.0 l10n es mis report kpi #2

Open
wants to merge 86 commits into
base: 11.0-l10n_es_mis_report_kpi
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Josenv
Copy link

@Josenv Josenv commented Aug 20, 2018

Hola Jordi,

Hemos probado el módulo l10n_es_mis_report_kpi y vimos varios errores en el copy/paste de las plantillas, en este PR los corregimos, además, hemos añadido 5 ratios nuevos, para las plantillas de balance los ratios de solvencia, apalancamiento financiero y prueba ácida y sobre el pyg, rentabilidad económica y financiera, por otra parte hicimos alguna pequeña corrección en un par de ellos, endeudamiento y calidad de deuda. Igual tienes que hacer rebase de tú rama para ver los cambios de una manera más limpia.

Un saludo

etobella and others added 30 commits May 22, 2018 23:36
* Translations
* Terms homogeneization
* README by fragments
* Test reports
…k-xlsx

[11.0][IMP] l10n_es_vat_book: Exportacion a XLSX
oca-travis and others added 23 commits July 20, 2018 09:17
'product.product' object has no attribute 'tax_line_ids'
This refund mode (SII key 'S') is not fully working as is (it requires 3 invoices), and was
causing problems when using it. It was also understandably the default value!
`amount_total_company_signed` can contain unrounded amounts, so we need to round that
amount. We use python `round` for avoiding the same problem in this result.
Putting groups in the view is not enough for preventing Odoo to load the linked one2many model,
resulting in an error for those without permissions in queue.job object. The solution for this
is to isolate that changes in a separate view with a group, and this way the fields are not
fetched anymore if the user doesn't belong to that group.

There's other view group that also has the same group (AEAT responsible), but shouldn't be
isolated, as there's a field there (sii_state), that it's needed for the visibility of
other elements, and there's no problem with them, as they are not x2x fields.
HviorForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2019
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
MiquelRForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2020
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
MiquelRForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
MiquelRForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2020
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
MiquelRForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2021
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
MiquelRForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2022
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
LauraCForgeFlow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…olves compatibility problems with python3) (#1)

* Adds tests for exporting files to boe with an export config (#2)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.