Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volatile-metal partitioning during accretion #180

Open
timlichtenberg opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Volatile-metal partitioning during accretion #180

timlichtenberg opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
interior Physics - interior evolution Priority 4: tbd Priority level 4: nice to have features and/or has some time

Comments

@timlichtenberg
Copy link
Collaborator

timlichtenberg commented Sep 16, 2024

It would make sense to generalise the initial conditions for PROTEUS to bulk parameters instead of mantle parameters. At the moment, we set the conditions in the mantle + atmosphere system, but ignore what could be in the core. This means that to get to whole-planet composition, one needs to make an assumption about how much may be locked up in the core and post-process.

Instead, we could generalise the initial conditions to mean bulk parameters by introducing functionality to compute the partitioning of H-C-N-S(-P) elements into the metal core. This can be done by, for example, fixing the metal-volatile partitioning according to simple partitioning coefficients like reviewed in Suer et al. (2023) (Tab. 1).

This should probably be handled through the ABASSI module.

@nichollsh
Copy link
Contributor

nichollsh commented Sep 26, 2024

Are there any plans to handle this in atmodeller? Seems like this would have to be included in the outgassing calculation, if some of the volatile elements are going to be partitioned into the core (or at least into metal droplets) as well as the mantle and atmosphere.

@timlichtenberg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timlichtenberg commented Sep 30, 2024

I guess it could, even though this would be a substantial extension. The partitioning into the core would be highly time-dependent if ongoing accretion is modelled, so possibly ABASSI would be a better place for this. Even though other models assume that the core is "open" or "closed" to a certain mass fraction.

@lsoucasse lsoucasse added the interior Physics - interior evolution label Nov 11, 2024
@timlichtenberg timlichtenberg added the Priority 4: tbd Priority level 4: nice to have features and/or has some time label Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
interior Physics - interior evolution Priority 4: tbd Priority level 4: nice to have features and/or has some time
Projects
Status: TBD
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants