Create governance-based-project-setup.md #699
Conversation
As discussed in Slack previously this adds a new pattern to link our Governance Levels with information on what pre-requisits need to be fulfilled to reach the respective governance level. The pattern looks at several factors: * Knowledge needed by contributors and host team. * General advise on project structure. * Maturity levels that need to be reached. * Relevant patterns.
MaineC
requested review from
lenucksi,
NewMexicoKid,
cewilliams,
spier,
robtuley and
yuhattor
as code owners
MaineC
added
1-initial
|
This pattern resonates. So from an atomic and or reductionist view it makes sense to stand on it's own. It is useful on it's own and many groups would or could benefit. I also see stretch opportunities (taking a step back to an integrated or holistic view) with patterns that I/we (from Dojo Center) have proposed and that are in draft.
Stretch conversations can look orthogonal so I don't mean to necessarily unpack any intersection opportunities here. Given a future professional opportunity as an influencer, director or coach I would consider leveraging the patterns above together. TL/DR Very supportive and appreciative |
|
I fully agree that we need another pattern with a more holistic view to go along with this one. Thanks for your feedback, glad you find it helpful. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @MaineC for pushing your experiences into the open, in this case in the form of patterns!
I am just leaving some initial comments, and will do a more wholistic review at a later point.
Will already commit mini fixes that are purely formatting etc
| @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | |||
| ## Title | |||
|
|
|||
| Governance Level Guided Project Setup | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Found that title hard to understand. Need to think about a suggestion for a better one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I fully agree - and: naming is hard :)
Hmm. I think I need help brainstorming here.
Something that puts "capabilities" into the title?
What this pattern does is to pull several separate patterns together into a subsystem. I'm sure there is a term for that kind of text. Maybe @kjstol or @NewMexicoKid can provide some information for that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe something like "governance level drives maturity needs"?
|
|
||
| Governance Level Guided Project Setup | ||
|
|
||
| ## Patlet |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We typically sugggest to make the Patlet 2 sentences:
- 1st sentence for the problem
- 2nd setence for the solution
The current Patlet uses a lot more than that. Wondering if we can somehow shorten it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tried to shorten the patlet further, I don't get it down below three sentences.
|
Thanks for the initial review @spier - really appreciate the input on this one. |
|
@spier I believe I addressed your comments. Is there anything left to change before this can be merged? |
As discussed in Slack previously this adds a new pattern to link our Governance Levels with information on what pre-requisits need to be fulfilled to reach the respective governance level.
The pattern looks at several factors: