-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address review comments for InnerSource Hackathon pattern #721
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Spier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Spier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Spier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Spier <[email protected]>
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ The company wants to adopt InnerSource as software development methodology but o | |||
|
|||
The senior leadership believes in InnerSource and wants to drive it throughout the company. The engineers who are familiar with open source principles and/or understand the benefits of InnerSource are the early adopters. There is success with these initial pilot project and teams. Now the next step is to drive it across the company. There might be reluctance from engineering teams due to various factors like: | |||
|
|||
* not familiar with InnerSource and being ignorant to know about it | |||
* not familiar with InnerSource and not aware about it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"not familiar" and "not aware" sounds like saying the same thing twice now. I am not sure though.
I have also asked in the thread in slack if anybody has a better proposal.
* not enough time to prioritize InnerSource, given the regular work deliverables | ||
* relunctance to changing ways of working when everything works well already | ||
* perception that InnerSource requires more work and responsibilities | ||
* unclear ROI for the upfront setup innersourcing takes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* unclear ROI for the upfront setup innersourcing takes | |
* unclear return on investment for the upfront setup costs that an InnerSource project takes |
We try to stick to the spelling InnerSource, wherever possible. See explanation.
Also I removed an acronym and elaborated on the sentence a bit
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ The company wants to adopt InnerSource as software development methodology but o | |||
|
|||
The senior leadership believes in InnerSource and wants to drive it throughout the company. The engineers who are familiar with open source principles and/or understand the benefits of InnerSource are the early adopters. There is success with these initial pilot project and teams. Now the next step is to drive it across the company. There might be reluctance from engineering teams due to various factors like: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The senior leadership believes in InnerSource and wants to drive it throughout the company. The engineers who are familiar with open source principles and/or understand the benefits of InnerSource are the early adopters. There is success with these initial pilot project and teams. Now the next step is to drive it across the company. There might be reluctance from engineering teams due to various factors like: | |
The senior leadership believes in InnerSource and wants to drive it throughout the company. The engineers who are familiar with open source principles and/or understand the benefits of InnerSource are the early adopters. There is success with these initial pilot project and teams. | |
Now the next step is to drive it across the company. There might be reluctance from engineering teams due to various factors like: |
Splitting this into 2 paragraphs to make it easier to read.
Addressing reviewing comments by Sally Deering on this pattern