Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explain outlier detection models #896

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2022
Merged

Conversation

davnn
Copy link
Collaborator

@davnn davnn commented Jan 26, 2022

Adresses: #780 (comment)

Copy link
Member

@ablaom ablaom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davnn I really appreciate this thanks. This is excellent.

Perhaps you could just mention the existence of the wrappers that "promote" one type of detector to another, eg, UnsupervisedDetector -> ProbablisticUnsupervisedDetector?

In any case, glad to merge.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #896 (1646260) into dev (65519ce) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #896   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   42.85%   42.85%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          28       28           
=======================================
  Hits           12       12           
  Misses         16       16           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 65519ce...1646260. Read the comment docs.

@davnn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davnn commented Feb 2, 2022

@ablaom added another short section to describe the model wrapper interop.

@ablaom ablaom merged commit 01ebba3 into JuliaAI:dev Feb 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants