Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: drop lingua-franca #17

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

fix: drop lingua-franca #17

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Nov 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced number parsing capabilities in the randomness skill with updated dependencies.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved functionality for dice rolling methods by utilizing a more efficient number extraction process.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependency specifications in requirements.txt and skill.json to reflect the removal of outdated packages and the addition of a new number parser.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the dependency specifications in both requirements.txt and skill.json, where the package ovos-lingua_franca has been replaced by ovos-number-parser with a specified version range. Additionally, the import statement for the extract_number function in skill_randomness/__init__.py has been modified to reflect this change, ensuring that the updated number parsing functionality is utilized in the skill's methods.

Changes

File Change Summary
requirements.txt Removed ovos-lingua_franca, added ovos-number-parser>=0.0.1,<1.0.0
skill.json Updated requirements: replaced ovos-lingua_franca with ovos-number-parser>=0.0.1,<1.0.0
skill_randomness/init.py Updated import from lingua_franca.parse to ovos_number_parser for extract_number function

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New numbers dance in a brighter way.
With ovos-number-parser now in sight,
We roll the dice, oh what a delight!
Goodbye to the old, hello to the new,
Hopping along, with changes so true! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Nov 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Nov 7, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
skill_randomness/__init__.py (1)

Line range hint 89-114: Recommend thorough testing of number parsing scenarios.

While the change is focused, please ensure comprehensive testing of:

  1. Various number formats (integers, decimals, written numbers)
  2. Different languages supported by your skill
  3. Edge cases (empty strings, invalid inputs)
  4. Default value handling

This will help verify that the new parser maintains the same behavior as lingua-franca.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76357b1 and 18f415e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
  • skill.json (1 hunks)
  • skill_randomness/__init__.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • requirements.txt
🔇 Additional comments (5)
skill.json (2)

25-25: Consider updating the minimum version requirement.

The current version constraint >=0.0.1 starts from a very early version. Consider updating to a more stable minimum version if one is available.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version of ovos-number-parser
# This helps determine if a higher minimum version should be specified

echo "Checking PyPI for latest ovos-number-parser version..."
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-number-parser/json | jq -r '.releases | keys[]' | sort -V | tail -n 1

25-25: Verify the functionality with ovos-number-parser.

The replacement of ovos-lingua_franca with ovos-number-parser aligns with the PR objective. However, let's verify that all number parsing functionality is maintained.

✅ Verification successful

Migration to ovos-number-parser is correctly implemented

The verification shows that:

  • All lingua_franca references have been completely removed
  • ovos-number-parser is properly imported and used in __init__.py
  • The extract_number function is used consistently in dice rolling functions
  • The requirements.txt correctly includes the new dependency
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all number parsing functionality is maintained
# Look for any remaining references to lingua_franca and check number parsing usage

# Check for any lingering lingua_franca references
echo "Checking for lingering lingua_franca references..."
rg -l "lingua.?franca|lingua_franca"

# Check number parsing usage patterns
echo "Checking number parsing usage patterns..."
rg -A 3 "extract_number|parse_number"

Length of output: 328


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the changes more thoroughly

# Check for any remaining lingua_franca imports or usage
echo "Checking for lingua_franca imports or usage..."
rg -l "from lingua|import lingua"

# Check for number parsing functionality in Python files
echo "Checking number parsing in Python files..."
rg -t py "number_parser|extract_number|parse_number" -A 2

# Check requirements.txt for related dependencies
echo "Checking requirements.txt..."
if [ -f "requirements.txt" ]; then
    cat requirements.txt
fi

# Check __init__.py for usage patterns
echo "Checking __init__.py for number parsing..."
fd -t f "__init__.py" --exec cat {}

Length of output: 6242

skill_randomness/__init__.py (3)

10-10: LGTM! Import change looks good.

The import statement has been correctly updated to use ovos_number_parser instead of lingua_franca.parse, aligning with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 13-13


Line range hint 99-114: Verify number parsing behavior for multiple dice.

The method uses extract_number in two different ways:

  1. Parsing 'number' without a default value
  2. Parsing 'faces' with default "6"

Please ensure:

  1. The function handles both patterns correctly
  2. The returned values are compatible with integer operations (used in range(1, int(number) + 1))
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the extract_number function to understand its behavior.


No issues found with number parsing patterns

The code uses extract_number from the ovos_number_parser library, which is a standard number parsing utility in the OVOS ecosystem. The usage patterns observed in the code are consistent:

  1. For required parameters (like 'number'): Direct parsing without defaults
  2. For optional parameters (like 'faces'): Parsing with a default value of "6"

Both patterns are valid and the library is designed to handle these cases, returning values that are compatible with integer operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify number parsing behavior in the codebase

# Test: Look for similar usage patterns of extract_number without defaults
rg "extract_number\([^,\"]+" 

# Test: Check for any test files that might verify this behavior
fd -g "*test*.py" | xargs rg "extract_number"

Length of output: 402


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for the implementation of extract_number function
ast-grep --pattern 'def extract_number($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Also check for any imports of this function
rg "from .+ import extract_number"
rg "import .+extract_number"

Length of output: 198


Line range hint 89-97: Verify API compatibility with ovos_number_parser.

The extract_number function is used here with the lang parameter and expected to handle string input "6". Please verify:

  1. The new package supports language-specific parsing via the lang parameter
  2. The function handles string inputs similarly to the previous implementation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant