[AIFD] Add new object type AIFD

[D047539]

No description provided.

[cla-assistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[schneidermic0]

See my first comments/questions below.

Do you think it is possible to provide an example? I guess this will help us to review the object type.

[schneidermic0]

I am sorry for the late response. I did not manage to look into it earlier.

Thanks for providing the example. This was helpful for me. 👍

I try to first have a look at the general structure. Most probably I suggest to use different names, later as soon as you think the structure is fine.

[schneidermic0]

I guess I understood your object's structure, now. This is fine for me.

I just found some minor issues/questions.

[schneidermic0]

@D047539 Thanks for all your adaptations. In general it looks good to me. 👍

However, I am still struggling with the different interface names and object names and I am not sure whether I get your requirements. Do you think it makes sense to discuss this in a short call with you, @wurzka and me?

Open question has been clarified. Since I won't be available for the next two weeks, I will dismiss my review

[wurzka]

Thanks for the adaption. Looks good to me, now.

[wurzka]

Thanks for your update. Looks good to me.

[albertmink]

@D047539 did you consider to change interfaceObjectName to name? Typically, the array name, here 'aifInterfaces', is sufficient and in particular if the array element contains a single String.

[D047539]

@albertmink no, we have not changed the name from interfaceObjectName to name because name is very generic one and from our point of view it is not a clear name. We would like to keep the interfaceObjectName as name.

[albertmink]

As this has been suggested beforehand, I just wanted to make sure that this has been considered by you. You are allowed to overrule our suggestions 😐

[albertmink]

LGTM