Skip to content

Comparing performance of classical and quantum optimzation solvers for the optimal placement of sensors in water distribution networks

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

SECQUOIA/WDN_Sensor_Placement

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

6 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Sensor Placement in Water Distribution Networks (WDN)

This repository consists of notebooks using which, we formulate an optimization problem to identify the optimal placement of pressure sensors in a Water Distribution Network (WDN). The WDN is represented on a constrained graph G(V,E), where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges.

The solution to this graph problem is explored using different reformulations of the problem.

First, we formulate the graph optimization problem as a Mixed Integer Program (MIP) (Speziali et al. (2021)):

min_{x} sum_{i in V} c_{i}x_{i} + sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}(1 - x_{j} - x_{i} + x_{i}x_{j})
s.t. sum_{i in V} x_{i} = s
x_{i} in {0,1}^{n}

Here, c_{i} represents the cost of the i-th node, w_{ij} represents the weight corresponding to the edge between nodes i and j, and x_{i} in {0, 1}^{n} is a binary decision variable that indicates whether a sensor is placed at the i-th node. s is the predefined total number of sensors.

Next, the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulation of the graph problem is explored. Consider the MIP model from before:

min_{x} sum_{i in V} c_{i}x_{i} + sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}(1 - x_{j} - x_{i} + x_{i}x_{j})
s.t. sum_{i in V} x_{i} = s
x_{i} in {0,1}^{n}

To implement the problem as a QUBO, the constraint should be lifted up into the objective function such that the problem becomes unconstrained. This is performed as follows:

min_{x} sum_{i in V} c_{i}x_{i} + sum_{(i, j) in E} (w_{ij}(1 - x_{j} - x_{i} + x_{i}x_{j})) + rho(sum_{i in V} x_{i} - s)^2

where rho is a scalar penalty term. Further simplification leads to

min_{x} sum_{i in V} c_{i}x_{i} + sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij} - sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{j} - sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{i} + sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{i}x_{j} + rho sum_{i in V} x_{i}^2 - 2rho sum_{i in V} x_{i}s + rho s^2

Since x_{i} is a binary variable, we can write x_{i} as x_{i}^2. Taking this into account, the problem now becomes:

min_{x} sum_{i in V} c_{i}x_{i}^2 + sum_{(i, j) in E}w_{ij} - sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{j}^2 - sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{i}^2 + sum_{(i, j) in E} w_{ij}x_{i}x_{j} + rho sum_{i in V} x_{i}^2 - 2rho sum_{i in V} x_{i}^2s + rho s^2

Performing some algebraic manipulations, we have our QUBO problem:

min_{x} ( sum_{i in V} (c_i + rho - 2rho s - w_{ij})x_i^2 + sum_{(i,j) in E} w_{ij}x_i x_j + rho s^2 + sum_{(i,j) in E} w_{ij} )

where s is the total number of sensors that is predefined.

The optimal sensor placement problem is solved using five different solvers: Gurobi, dwave-tabu Tabu Search Sampler, dwave-neal Simulated Annealing Sampler, D-Wave Leap Hybrid Quantum-Classical solver and D-Wave Advantage 4.1 Quantum Annealer. Additionally, we leverage Networkx for network models and graphs.

About

Comparing performance of classical and quantum optimzation solvers for the optimal placement of sensors in water distribution networks

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published