-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add water_network instance #59
Changes from 16 commits
fffd81c
f784ca0
8b5f14a
119b246
435b80c
b69965c
6ea4d16
eae3d93
ac2397b
d6b9cba
88c7b6d
cd21c07
6e3333c
ac4acae
d9a3031
13d7a7c
325890c
493365f
3d68a25
ab9db0c
da82210
6b68964
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ | |
hda = "hda" | ||
HDA = "HDA" | ||
equil = "equil" | ||
ue = "ue" | ||
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ | ||
## Water Network Design | ||
|
||
In the Water Treatment Network (WTN) design problem, given is a set of water streams with known concentrations of contaminants and flow rate. | ||
The objective is to find the set of treatment units and interconnections that minimize the cost of the WTN while satisfying maximum concentrations of contaminants in the reclaimed outlet stream. | ||
The WTN superstructure consists of a set of treatment units, contaminated feed streams carrying a set of contaminants, and a discharge unit. | ||
The fouled feed waters can be allocated to one or more treatment units or disposed of in the sink unit. Upon treatment, the reclaimed streams can be recycled, forwarded to other treatment units, or discharged into the sink unit. | ||
|
||
The mass balances are defined in terms of total flows and contaminants concentration. | ||
Nonconvexities arise from bilinear terms “flows times concentration” in the mixers mass balances and concave investment cost functions of treatment units. | ||
|
||
The instance incorporates two approximations of the concave cost term (piecewise linear and quadratic) to reformulate the original GDP model into a bilinear quadratic one. | ||
The user can create each instance like this: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
build_model(approximation='none') | ||
build_model(approximation='quadratic') | ||
build_model(approximation='piecewise') | ||
``` | ||
|
||
The general model description can be summarized as follows: | ||
Min Cost of Treatment Units | ||
s.t. | ||
Physical Constraints: | ||
(a) Mass balance around each splitter | ||
(b) Mass balance around each mixer | ||
(c) Mass balance around each treatment unit | ||
Performance Constraints: | ||
(d) Contaminant composition of the purified stream less or equal than a given limit | ||
for each contaminant. | ||
Logic Constraints: | ||
(e) Treatment units not chosen have their inlet flow set to zero | ||
(f) Every treatment unit chosen must have a minimum flow | ||
|
||
Assumptions: | ||
(i) The performance of the treatment units only depends on the total flow entering the unit and its composition. | ||
(ii) The flow of contaminants leaving the unit is a linear function of the inlet flow of contaminants. | ||
|
||
### Case Study | ||
|
||
The WTN comprises five inlet streams with four contaminants and four treatment units. | ||
The contaminant concentration and flow rate of the feed streams, contaminant recovery rates, minimum flow rate and cost coefficients of the treatment units, and the upper limit on the molar flow of contaminant in the purified stream, are reported in [2]. | ||
|
||
### Solution | ||
|
||
Best known objective value: $348,340 | ||
|
||
### Size | ||
|
||
| Component | original | pwl | quadratic | | ||
| :-------------------- | -------- | :--: | :-------: | | ||
| variables | 395 | 1405 | 420 | | ||
| binary_variables | 10 | 510 | 10 | | ||
| integer_variables | 0 | 0 | 0 | | ||
| continuous_variables | 385 | 895 | 410 | | ||
| disjunctions | 5 | 5 | 5 | | ||
| disjuncts | 10 | 10 | 10 | | ||
| constraints | 329 | 1339 | 334 | | ||
| nonlinear_constraints | 33 | 28 | 33 | | ||
|
||
### References | ||
|
||
> [1] Tristán C., Fallanza M., Ibáñez R., Grossmann I. E., and Bernal Neira D. E. (2024). Global Optimization via Quadratic Disjunctive Programming for Water Networks Design with Energy Recovery. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 53, 2161–2166. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50361-6 | ||
> | ||
> [2] Ruiz J., and Grossmann I. E. Water Treatment Network Design. 2009 Available from CyberInfrastructure for [MINLP](www.minlp.org), a collaboration of Carnegie Mellon University and IBM at: www.minlp.org/library/problem/index.php?i=24 | ||
> | ||
> [3] Ruiz, J., and Grossmann, I. E. (2011). Using redundancy to strengthen the relaxation for the global optimization of MINLP problems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(12), 2729–2740. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCHEMENG.2011.01.035 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
cont,T | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We would like to scale this instance to more cases, so I rather leave all in CSVs |
||
A,3 | ||
B,3 | ||
C,3 | ||
D,3 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
TU,A,B,C,D,L,theta,beta | ||
t1,0.95,0.95,0.6,0.0,5,1500,8000 | ||
t2,0.08,0.8,0.6,0.0,3,1000,8000 | ||
t3,0.0,0.6,0.95,0.95,4,4000,8000 | ||
t4,0.0,0.6,0.8,0.85,3,3000,8000 | ||
t5,0.0,0.6,0.85,0.8,1,3000,8000 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
from .wnd import build_model | ||
|
||
__all__ = ['build_model'] |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
FSU,A,B,C,D,flow_rate | ||
fs1,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,10 | ||
fs2,1.3333333333333333,0.0,0.0,0.6666666666666666,15 | ||
fs3,2.0,2.0,0.0,4.0,5 | ||
fs4,1.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,20 | ||
fs5,2.0,2.0,0.0,0.0,10 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is ue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ue
stands forunit_exists