RFC: multilingual option
#1148
Draft
RFC: multilingual option
#1148
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MahmoudAshraf97
force-pushed
the
multilingual
branch
from
8002d62
to
f4fd527
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
multilingualoption with english-german audiooutput_languageargument as it is redundant, you can get the same functionality withtask="translate"and I've verified this with several model sizesencoder_outputfor language detectionTODO:
As for the RFC, I'm contemplating removing this option completely, so if anyone has opinions with or against let me know in the comments