Rename three sum

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Adding tests and implementation for a Battleship game
• 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new Battleship game implementation along with its tests. The game is implemented as a class with methods to create a game, place ships, take turns, and check the game status. The tests cover both positive and negative scenarios, ensuring the game behaves as expected.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the code is clean and well-organized. The tests are comprehensive and cover a wide range of scenarios. It would be beneficial to add more comments in the code to explain the logic and flow, especially in complex methods.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/6_battleship/artifacts_in/test_positive.py
    suggestion: Consider adding more edge case tests, like placing the ship at the edge of the board, or hitting the same spot multiple times. [medium]
    relevant line: def test_turns_and_results(battleship_game, initialized_game_id):

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/6_battleship/artifacts_out/battleship.py
    suggestion: It would be beneficial to add some error handling for when the game_id does not exist in the games dictionary. Currently, it would raise a KeyError which may not be very informative for the user. [medium]
    relevant line: def create_game(self) -> int:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/6_battleship/artifacts_out/battleship.py
    suggestion: Consider refactoring the create_turn method. It's quite long and complex, and could potentially be broken down into smaller, more manageable methods. [medium]
    relevant line: def create_turn(self, game_id: str, turn: Turn) -> TurnResponse:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/6_battleship/artifacts_out/battleship.py
    suggestion: Consider adding a method to check if a position is within the board boundaries. This would avoid repeating the same checks in multiple places. [medium]
    relevant line: def create_ship_placement(self, game_id: str, placement: ShipPlacement) -> None:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.