Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use strict comparison in various files #3873

Open
wants to merge 168 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SergeyBiryukov
Copy link
Member

@SergeyBiryukov SergeyBiryukov commented Jan 19, 2023

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 14, 2024

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props sergeybiryukov, aristath, peterwilsoncc.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

Copy link
Member

@aristath aristath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@peterwilsoncc peterwilsoncc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need tests before it can be merged:

To avoid a repeat of Core-61749:

  • Anything that calls WP_Query will need checks for both arrays and query string formatted arguments passed to wp_parse_args()
  • Same for any of the other altered functions that use wp_parse_args()

I can see an issue with the privacy policy code breaking is_privacy_policy for one but expect there will be other issue that need testing. To reproduce the issue with the privacy policy:

  1. In the dashboard create a page named Privacy Policy
  2. In Settings > Privacy define the page as such
  3. Run the following command in the CLI
    $ git checkout trunk
    $ wp eval "var_dump( ( new WP_Query( [ 'page_id' => 128, 'post_type' => 'page' ] ) )->is_privacy_policy );"
    :bool(true)
    $ gh pr checkout 3873 ## This branch (Sergey can use git checkout)
    $ wp eval "var_dump( ( new WP_Query( [ 'page_id' => 128, 'post_type' => 'page' ] ) )->is_privacy_policy );"
    :bool(false)
    

@SergeyBiryukov
Copy link
Member Author

This will need tests before it can be merged:

Indeed, this is basically still a draft where I cherry-pick certain changes after a closer review, making sure they are covered by new or existing tests. I will investigate anything related to wp_parse_args() and WP_Query, thanks!

@SergeyBiryukov SergeyBiryukov force-pushed the 56791-coding-standards branch from 11a2d4f to 340c975 Compare October 6, 2024 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants