Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for unknown transactions #569
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add support for unknown transactions #569
Changes from all commits
b373230
6251706
c8cfa50
29e3f04
ea26ff0
3041912
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check warning on line 62 in xrpl4j-core/src/main/java/org/xrpl/xrpl4j/model/transactions/UnknownTransaction.java
Codecov / codecov/patch
xrpl4j-core/src/main/java/org/xrpl/xrpl4j/model/transactions/UnknownTransaction.java#L62
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sappenin we should discuss this change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, if we wanted to keep the
@Derived
could make a special carve-out in the Deserializer to addAccount
intoEXTRA_TRANSACTION_FIELDS
.However, that's ugly, and makes it so nobody can create a
UnlModify
with an account that's not account-zero. That's a non-goal ATM, but I think I prefer making this@Default
just in case someone every wants to do that (e.g., for testing, or whatever).