-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check SimpleFIN access key format #485
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a validation mechanism within the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
upcoming-release-notes/485.md
is excluded by!**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/app-simplefin/app-simplefin.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app-simplefin/app-simplefin.js (1)
265-268
: Verify the impact on error handling flowThe error thrown here is caught in multiple places. Ensure consistent error handling across all code paths.
Let's verify the error handling paths:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling for invalid access key is properly implemented
The error handling for invalid access keys is consistent across the codebase:
- The validation occurs in the access key parsing logic, throwing an "Invalid access key" error
- This error is caught within the higher-level
handleError
wrapper function (as seen in the try-catch blocks)- Different error scenarios are handled appropriately:
- Invalid access key format triggers the validation error
- Forbidden (403) responses are handled separately
- JSON parsing errors are caught and processed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check error handling for invalid access keys # Look for catch blocks handling parseAccessKey errors rg -A 5 "catch.*{" src/app-simplefin/Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's fix the regex and search for catch blocks rg -A 5 "catch\s*\{" src/app-simplefin/ # Also search for any error handling related to access key validation rg -B 3 -A 3 "Invalid.*access key" src/app-simplefin/ # Look for try blocks that might be related to access key handling rg -B 3 -A 3 "try\s*\{" src/app-simplefin/Length of output: 2897
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | ||
console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`); | ||
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error messages for better debugging
The current error message "Invalid access key" doesn't provide enough context about what specifically is wrong with the format.
Consider providing more specific error messages:
- throw new Error(`Invalid access key`);
+ throw new Error('Invalid access key format. Expected format: https://username:[email protected]');
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | |
console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`); | |
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | |
} | |
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | |
console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`); | |
throw new Error('Invalid access key format. Expected format: https://username:[email protected]'); | |
} |
Security: Remove sensitive data from error logs
The current implementation logs the full access key which contains credentials. This poses a security risk as credentials could be exposed in log files.
Apply this change to remove sensitive data from logs:
- console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`);
+ console.log('Invalid SimpleFIN access key format');
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | |
console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`); | |
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | |
} | |
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | |
console.log('Invalid SimpleFIN access key format'); | |
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | |
} |
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen the access key validation
The current regex pattern (^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$
) is too permissive and could allow malformed URLs. Consider these improvements:
- Validate scheme is 'http://' or 'https://'
- Ensure username and password are not empty
- Validate the base URL format
Consider applying this improved validation:
- if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) {
+ if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^https?:\/\/[^:]+:[^@]+@[^/]+$/)) {
console.log('Invalid SimpleFIN access key format');
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`);
}
+ // Additional validation after splitting
+ [scheme, rest] = accessKey.split('//');
+ if (!['http:', 'https:'].includes(scheme)) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid scheme: must be http or https');
+ }
+ [auth, rest] = rest.split('@');
+ [username, password] = auth.split(':');
+ if (!username || !password) {
+ throw new Error('Missing credentials');
+ }
+ if (!rest || !rest.includes('.')) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid base URL');
+ }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^.*\/\/.*:.*@.*$/)) { | |
console.log(`Invalid SimpleFIN access key: ${accessKey}`); | |
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | |
} | |
if (!accessKey || !accessKey.match(/^https?:\/\/[^:]+:[^@]+@[^/]+$/)) { | |
console.log('Invalid SimpleFIN access key format'); | |
throw new Error(`Invalid access key`); | |
} | |
// Additional validation after splitting | |
[scheme, rest] = accessKey.split('//'); | |
if (!['http:', 'https:'].includes(scheme)) { | |
throw new Error('Invalid scheme: must be http or https'); | |
} | |
[auth, rest] = rest.split('@'); | |
[username, password] = auth.split(':'); | |
if (!username || !password) { | |
throw new Error('Missing credentials'); | |
} | |
if (!rest || !rest.includes('.')) { | |
throw new Error('Invalid base URL'); | |
} |
Adds a check to ensure the SimpleFIN accessKey is in the expected format. Helps avoid silent errors if the key was invalid (e.g., if CloudFlare blocked the call).