Skip to content

CSRF protection for any URL can be bypassed in Jenkins Pipeline: Input Step Plugin

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Oct 19, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jan 5, 2024

Package

maven org.jenkins-ci.plugins:pipeline-input-step (Maven)

Affected versions

< 456.vd8a

Patched versions

456.vd8a_957db_5b_e9

Description

Pipeline: Input Step Plugin 451.vf1a_a_4f405289 and earlier does not restrict or sanitize the optionally specified ID of the input step. This ID is used for the URLs that process user interactions for the given input step (proceed or abort) and is not correctly encoded.

This allows attackers able to configure Pipelines to have Jenkins build URLs from input step IDs that would bypass the CSRF protection of any target URL in Jenkins when the input step is interacted with.

Pipeline: Input Step Plugin 456.vd8a_957db_5b_e9 limits the characters that can be used for the ID of input steps in Pipelines to alphanumeric characters and URL-safe punctuation. Pipelines with input steps having IDs with prohibited characters will fail with an error.

This includes Pipelines that have already been started but not finished before Jenkins is restarted to apply this update.

Pipeline: Declarative Plugin provides an input directive that is internally using the input step, and specifies a non-default ID if not user-defined. Pipeline: Declarative Plugin 2.2114.v2654ca_721309 and earlier may specify values incompatible with this new restriction on legal values: input directives in a stage use the stage name (which may include prohibited characters) and input directives in a matrix will use a value generated from the matrix axis values (which always includes prohibited characters). Administrators are advised to update Pipeline: Input Step Plugin and Pipeline: Declarative Plugin at the same time, ideally while no Pipelines are running.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Oct 19, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 19, 2022
Reviewed Oct 19, 2022
Last updated Jan 5, 2024

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

0.091%
(40th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-43407

GHSA ID

GHSA-g66m-fqxf-3w35

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.