Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): lock file maintenance #318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 22, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Tuesday" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from pbennett as a code owner October 22, 2024 04:53
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from drichar as a code owner October 22, 2024 04:53
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
reti ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 7:54pm

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 7805206 to ee724c6 Compare October 23, 2024 19:52
@pbennett pbennett merged commit 72a3ea5 into dev Oct 24, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant