add wording for implicit bindings, tk maybe a note

link/v1.0/link-v1.0.md

@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Elements are the same as in [global graph references](#sec-Global-Graph-Referenc
 
 A {Binding} contains:
 - {gref}: GRef — the [global graph reference](#sec-Global-Graph-References) which is the target of the binding
-- {implicit}: Bool — indicating whether the binding was explicitly imported or created implicitly. Implicit bindings may be overwritten by explicit bindings and will not be formed if an explicit binding for the item alreaady exists
+- {implicit}: Bool — indicating whether the binding was explicitly imported or created implicitly. Implicit bindings are "soft"—they may be overwritten by explicit bindings and will not be formed if an explicit binding for the item alreaady exists.
 
 Similar to a [gref](#sec-Global-Graph-References)'s elements, different types of scoped items can have the same name without conflict. For example, a scope can contain both a type and schema named "User", although this should generally be avoided if possible.