feat: add tests for dashboard script #3344
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
vishvamsinh28
requested review from
derberg,
akshatnema,
magicmatatjahu,
anshgoyalevil,
Mayaleeeee and
asyncapi-bot-eve
as code owners
|
⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3344--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/ |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3344 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.14% 59.01% +9.86%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 647 649 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 318 383 +65
+ Misses 329 266 -63 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js (4)
1-35: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc type definitions.The mock discussion objects are well-structured and cover both paginated and non-paginated scenarios. They accurately represent GitHub's GraphQL API response format.
Consider adding JSDoc type definitions to improve code documentation and IDE support:
/** * @typedef {Object} DiscussionMock * @property {string} id - Discussion identifier * @property {string} __typename - GraphQL type name * @property {string} title - Discussion title * @property {{ login: string }} author - Author information * @property {string} resourcePath - Resource URL path * @property {{ name: string }} repository - Repository information * @property {{ totalCount: number }} assignees - Assignees count * @property {{ totalCount: number }} reactions - Reactions count * @property {{ * totalCount: number, * nodes: Array<{ reactions: { totalCount: number } }>, * pageInfo: { hasNextPage: boolean } * }} comments - Comments information * @property {{ nodes: Array<any> }} labels - Labels information * @property {{ updatedAt: string }} timelineItems - Timeline information */🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 2-2: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 20-20: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
52-63: LGTM! Consider extracting rate limit values as constants.The rate limit mock accurately represents GitHub's API response structure.
Consider extracting the rate limit values as named constants for better maintainability:
const RATE_LIMIT_CONSTANTS = { DEFAULT_COST: 1, DEFAULT_LIMIT: 5000, DEFAULT_REMAINING: 50 };🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 53-53: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
65-73: Consider enhancing issue mock data coverage.While the current mock covers basic issue properties, consider adding:
- Multiple issues with different states (open/closed)
- Created/updated timestamps for testing sorting
- Different label combinations for filtering tests
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 65-65: Insert
⏎··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace
}with··}⏎(prettier/prettier)
1-81: Fix formatting issues throughout the file.The static analysis indicates numerous formatting inconsistencies. Run Prettier to automatically fix these issues:
npx prettier --write tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 2-2: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 20-20: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace
······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············withnodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 65-65: Insert
⏎··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace
}with··}⏎(prettier/prettier)
[error] 76-76: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 77-77: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 78-78: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 79-79: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 80-80: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (6)
Line range hint
1-49: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling in getDiscussions.The switch to
fs-extraand the implementation of rate limit checking is good. However, the error handling ingetDiscussionscould be more specific about what went wrong.Consider enhancing the error handling:
} catch (e) { - console.error(e); + console.error('Failed to fetch discussions:', { + error: e.message, + pageSize, + endCursor + }); return Promise.reject(e); }
Line range hint
50-65: Enhance error handling in getDiscussionByID.Similar to the previous suggestion, the error handling could be more informative to help with debugging.
Consider this enhancement:
} catch (e) { - console.error(e); + console.error('Failed to fetch discussion by ID:', { + error: e.message, + discussionId: id, + type: isPR ? 'PullRequest' : 'Issue' + }); return Promise.reject(e); }
84-87: Consider extracting interaction calculation logic.The interaction count calculation for PRs has been updated to include reviews, but this logic is embedded in the function. Consider extracting it to make it more maintainable and testable.
Consider creating a separate function:
+function calculateInteractions(discussion, isPR) { + const baseCount = discussion.reactions.totalCount + + discussion.comments.totalCount + + discussion.comments.nodes.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr.reactions.totalCount, 0); + + return isPR + ? baseCount + + discussion.reviews.totalCount + + discussion.reviews.nodes.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr.comments.totalCount, 0) + : baseCount; +}🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 84-84: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 85-85: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
117-122: Consider making the scoring formula configurable.The scoring formula uses hardcoded values (1.8 power factor, top 12 items). These could be configuration parameters for better flexibility.
Consider adding these as environment variables or configuration parameters:
+const SCORE_DECAY_FACTOR = process.env.SCORE_DECAY_FACTOR || 1.8; +const TOP_DISCUSSIONS_LIMIT = process.env.TOP_DISCUSSIONS_LIMIT || 12; result.sort((ElemA, ElemB) => ElemB.score - ElemA.score); const filteredResult = result.filter((issue) => issue.author !== 'asyncapi-bot'); -return filteredResult.slice(0, 12); +return filteredResult.slice(0, TOP_DISCUSSIONS_LIMIT);
Line range hint
154-170: Fix inconsistent return behavior in start function.The function returns undefined in the error case, which violates the principle of consistent return values.
Fix the return behavior:
async function start(writePath) { try { const issues = await getDiscussions(Queries.hotDiscussionsIssues, 20); const PRs = await getDiscussions(Queries.hotDiscussionsPullRequests, 20); const rawGoodFirstIssues = await getDiscussions(Queries.goodFirstIssues, 20); const discussions = issues.concat(PRs); const [hotDiscussions, goodFirstIssues] = await Promise.all([ getHotDiscussions(discussions), mapGoodFirstIssues(rawGoodFirstIssues) ]); return await writeToFile({ hotDiscussions, goodFirstIssues }, writePath); } catch (e) { console.log('There were some issues parsing data from github.'); console.log(e); + throw e; // Re-throw to maintain consistent error handling } }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 176-176: Replace
·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions·with⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎(prettier/prettier)
176-176: Fix exports formatting.The exports line needs formatting according to prettier rules.
Format the exports:
-module.exports = { getLabel, monthsSince, mapGoodFirstIssues, getHotDiscussions, getDiscussionByID, getDiscussions, writeToFile, start, processHotDiscussions }; +module.exports = { + getLabel, + monthsSince, + mapGoodFirstIssues, + getHotDiscussions, + getDiscussionByID, + getDiscussions, + writeToFile, + start, + processHotDiscussions +};🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 176-176: Replace
·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions·with⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎(prettier/prettier)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (3)
26-49: LGTM! Well-implemented test lifecycle management.The test lifecycle hooks demonstrate good practices:
- Using temporary directory for file operations
- Proper cleanup after tests
- Console spying for validation
Fix the formatting issues:
- consoleErrorSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => { }); - consoleLogSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation(() => { }); + consoleErrorSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => {}); + consoleLogSpy = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation(() => {});🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 26-26: 'describe' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 31-31: 'beforeAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 36-36: 'afterAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 40-40: 'beforeEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 41-41: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: Delete
·(prettier/prettier)
[error] 43-43: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 43-43: Delete
·(prettier/prettier)
[error] 46-46: 'afterEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
64-72: Strengthen assertions in discussion details test.The assertions could be more specific about the expected structure.
Consider adding more specific assertions:
expect(result[0]).toMatchObject({ id: 'paginated-discussion', isPR: false, - title: 'Test with Pagination' + title: 'Test with Pagination', + comments: expect.any(Array), + reactions: expect.any(Object) });
176-177: Improve hot discussions test assertion.The current assertion only checks the length is less than or equal to 12, but doesn't verify the sorting or scoring logic.
Consider adding assertions to verify:
- Discussions are sorted by score in descending order
- Each discussion has a valid score
expect(result).toEqual( expect.arrayContaining([ expect.objectContaining({ score: expect.any(Number) }) ]) ); // Verify sorting const scores = result.map(d => d.score); expect([...scores].sort((a, b) => b - a)).toEqual(scores);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js(6 hunks)tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js
[error] 84-84: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 85-85: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 154-154: Expected to return a value at the end of async function 'start'.
(consistent-return)
[error] 176-176: Replace ·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions· with ⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎
(prettier/prettier)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js
[error] 22-22: Replace "../fixtures/dashboardData") with '../fixtures/dashboardData');
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 26-26: 'describe' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 31-31: 'beforeAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 36-36: 'afterAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 40-40: 'beforeEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 41-41: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 43-43: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 43-43: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 46-46: 'afterEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 51-51: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 74-74: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 88-88: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 105-107: Replace ⏎······.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)⏎······ with .mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 113-113: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 122-122: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 133-133: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 141-141: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 147-147: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 147-148: Delete ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 156-156: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 165-165: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 179-179: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 186-186: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 187-187: 'consoleErrorSpy' is already declared in the upper scope on line 28 column 7.
(no-shadow)
[error] 187-187: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 188-188: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 190-190: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 191-193: Replace ⏎······'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'⏎···· with 'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 194-194: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js
[error] 2-2: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 20-20: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace ······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············ with nodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 65-65: Insert ⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace } with ··}⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 76-76: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 77-77: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 78-78: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 79-79: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 80-80: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js (1)
37-50: LGTM! Well-structured nested mock data.
The full discussion details mock effectively extends the base mock and provides good test coverage with varying reaction counts.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 38-38: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace ······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············ with nodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (1)
171-174: LGTM! Good use of module check.
The implementation correctly handles direct execution vs module import scenarios and properly ignores this block for test coverage.
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (2)
1-25: LGTM! Well-structured test setup with good practices.
The test setup follows good practices:
- Using fs-extra for better file operations
- Separating mock data into fixtures
- Proper Jest setup with mocking
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 22-22: Replace "../fixtures/dashboardData") with '../fixtures/dashboardData');
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
51-184: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.
The test suite provides good coverage of various scenarios:
- Pagination handling
- Rate limit warnings
- Error cases
- File operations
- Data processing
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 51-51: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 74-74: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 88-88: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 105-107: Replace ⏎······.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)⏎······ with .mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 113-113: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 122-122: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 133-133: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 141-141: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 147-147: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 147-148: Delete ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 156-156: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 165-165: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 179-179: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js
Outdated
| async function writeToFile(content, writePath) { | ||
| await writeFile(writePath, JSON.stringify(content, null, ' ')); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling to writeToFile function.
The function should handle potential file system errors gracefully.
Add error handling:
async function writeToFile(content, writePath) {
+ try {
await writeFile(writePath, JSON.stringify(content, null, ' '));
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to write dashboard data:', {
+ error: error.message,
+ writePath
+ });
+ throw error;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async function writeToFile(content, writePath) { | |
| await writeFile(writePath, JSON.stringify(content, null, ' ')); | |
| } | |
| async function writeToFile(content, writePath) { | |
| try { | |
| await writeFile(writePath, JSON.stringify(content, null, ' ')); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to write dashboard data:', { | |
| error: error.message, | |
| writePath | |
| }); | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (2)
16-22: Consider adding TypeScript or JSDoc types for mock data.The mock data imports are well-organized, but adding type definitions would improve maintainability and provide better IDE support.
Example:
/** @typedef {Object} MockDiscussion * @property {string} id * @property {string} title * ... other properties */ /** @type {MockDiscussion} */ const mockDiscussion = require('../fixtures/dashboardData').mockDiscussion;
165-177: Enhance test coverage for hot discussions processing.The test could be improved by:
- Adding assertions for the score calculation
- Verifying the sorting of discussions
- Testing edge cases with empty or invalid review data
it('should process hot discussions', async () => { const prDiscussion = { ...mockDiscussion, __typename: 'PullRequest', reviews: { totalCount: 1, nodes: [{ comments: { totalCount: 1 } }] } }; const result = await getHotDiscussions([mockDiscussion, prDiscussion]); // Verify length expect(result.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(12); // Verify scoring expect(result[0].score).toBeDefined(); expect(typeof result[0].score).toBe('number'); // Verify sorting const scores = result.map(d => d.score); expect(scores).toEqual([...scores].sort((a, b) => b - a)); // Verify PR specific fields const pr = result.find(d => d.__typename === 'PullRequest'); expect(pr.reviews).toBeDefined(); expect(pr.reviews.totalCount).toBe(1); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (2)
187-196: Skip: Variable shadowing issue already noted.
This issue was already identified in the past review comments. The suggested fixes for variable shadowing and grammatical errors should be applied.
51-154: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage.
The test suite demonstrates good practices:
- Clear test descriptions
- Proper mock setup and cleanup
- Good coverage of edge cases
- Effective use of Jest matchers
- Isolated file operations using temp directory
anshgoyalevil
added
the
gsoc
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js (4)
1-17: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the mock data structure.The mock discussion structure is well-defined and includes all necessary fields for testing. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and structure of this mock data.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Mock discussion data representing a basic discussion with minimal comments + * Used for testing the discussion fetching functionality + * @type {Object} + */ const mockDiscussion = {🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 2-2: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
19-73: Enhance test coverage with additional edge cases.While the mock data structures are well-defined, consider adding the following scenarios to improve test coverage:
- Error states (e.g., malformed discussion data)
- Empty/null values for optional fields
- Maximum length strings for title/comments
- Special characters in text fields
Would you like me to help generate additional mock data structures for these scenarios?
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 20-20: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace
······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············withnodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 65-65: Insert
⏎··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace
}with··}⏎(prettier/prettier)
1-81: Fix formatting issues throughout the file.The file has inconsistent indentation and spacing. Run Prettier to automatically fix these issues.
You can fix this by running:
npx prettier --write tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 2-2: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 20-20: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace
······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············withnodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete
······(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Replace
····with··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete
····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace
········with····(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 65-65: Insert
⏎··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace
}with··}⏎(prettier/prettier)
[error] 76-76: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 77-77: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 78-78: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 79-79: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 80-80: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
75-81: Consider organizing mock data by test scenario.The mock data effectively supports the dashboard testing objectives. To improve maintainability as more test cases are added, consider:
- Organizing mock data into separate files by scenario (e.g.,
discussionMocks.js,issueMocks.js)- Adding a README.md in the fixtures directory documenting the available mocks
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 76-76: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 77-77: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 78-78: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 79-79: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 80-80: Delete
··(prettier/prettier)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (4)
84-85: Fix indentation for better readability.The indentation in these lines should be consistent with the surrounding code.
Apply this diff to fix the indentation:
- discussion.reviews.totalCount + - discussion.reviews.nodes.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr.comments.totalCount, 0) + discussion.reviews.totalCount + + discussion.reviews.nodes.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + curr.comments.totalCount, 0)🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 84-84: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
[error] 85-85: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
Line range hint
98-98: Consider extracting magic numbers as named constants.The scoring formula uses magic numbers (2 and 1.8) which could be more maintainable as named constants that explain their purpose.
Consider this improvement:
+const SCORE_BASE_OFFSET = 2; +const SCORE_TIME_DECAY_FACTOR = 1.8; + // ... rest of the code ... - score: finalInteractionsCount / (monthsSince(discussion.timelineItems.updatedAt) + 2) ** 1.8 + score: finalInteractionsCount / (monthsSince(discussion.timelineItems.updatedAt) + SCORE_BASE_OFFSET) ** SCORE_TIME_DECAY_FACTOR
Line range hint
154-170: Ensure consistent return values in the start function.The function returns undefined in the error case, which is inconsistent with the success path that returns a Promise from writeToFile.
Apply this diff to fix the inconsistency:
async function start(writePath) { try { const issues = await getDiscussions(Queries.hotDiscussionsIssues, 20); const PRs = await getDiscussions(Queries.hotDiscussionsPullRequests, 20); const rawGoodFirstIssues = await getDiscussions(Queries.goodFirstIssues, 20); const discussions = issues.concat(PRs); const [hotDiscussions, goodFirstIssues] = await Promise.all([ getHotDiscussions(discussions), mapGoodFirstIssues(rawGoodFirstIssues) ]); return await writeToFile({ hotDiscussions, goodFirstIssues }, writePath); } catch (e) { console.log('There were some issues parsing data from github.'); console.log(e); + return Promise.reject(e); } }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 176-176: Replace
·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions·with⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎(prettier/prettier)
176-176: Improve readability of module exports.The module exports line is quite long and could be more readable with proper formatting.
Apply this diff to improve readability:
-module.exports = { getLabel, monthsSince, mapGoodFirstIssues, getHotDiscussions, getDiscussionByID, getDiscussions, writeToFile, start, processHotDiscussions }; +module.exports = { + getLabel, + monthsSince, + mapGoodFirstIssues, + getHotDiscussions, + getDiscussionByID, + getDiscussions, + writeToFile, + start, + processHotDiscussions +};🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 176-176: Replace
·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions·with⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎(prettier/prettier)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (3)
1-22: Maintain consistent string quotes.The imports use a mix of single and double quotes. Consider using single quotes consistently.
-} = require("../fixtures/dashboardData") +} = require('../fixtures/dashboardData');🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 22-22: Replace
"../fixtures/dashboardData")with'../fixtures/dashboardData');(prettier/prettier)
24-24: Add Jest setup file for global declarations.The ESLint errors about undefined Jest globals (
jest,describe,it, etc.) indicate missing Jest setup. Consider adding a Jest setup file to declare these globals.Create a
jest.setup.jsfile with:/* global jest, describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll, beforeEach, afterEach */And update your Jest configuration to include:
{ "setupFilesAfterEnv": ["<rootDir>/jest.setup.js"] }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 24-24: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
88-111: Enhance pagination test assertions.While the test verifies the length of results, consider adding assertions for:
- The correct cursor being passed to the second query
- The content of both pages being combined correctly
const result = await getDiscussions('test-query', 10); expect(result).toHaveLength(2); + expect(graphql).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2); + expect(graphql).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith( + expect.any(String), + expect.objectContaining({ + cursor: 'cursor1' + }) + ); + expect(result).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([ + expect.objectContaining({ id: 'test-id-2' }) + ]));🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 88-88: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 105-107: Replace
⏎······.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)⏎······with.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js(6 hunks)tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js
[error] 84-84: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 85-85: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 154-154: Expected to return a value at the end of async function 'start'.
(consistent-return)
[error] 176-176: Replace ·getLabel,·monthsSince,·mapGoodFirstIssues,·getHotDiscussions,·getDiscussionByID,·getDiscussions,·writeToFile,·start,·processHotDiscussions· with ⏎··getLabel,⏎··monthsSince,⏎··mapGoodFirstIssues,⏎··getHotDiscussions,⏎··getDiscussionByID,⏎··getDiscussions,⏎··writeToFile,⏎··start,⏎··processHotDiscussions⏎
(prettier/prettier)
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js
[error] 22-22: Replace "../fixtures/dashboardData") with '../fixtures/dashboardData');
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 26-26: 'describe' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 31-31: 'beforeAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 36-36: 'afterAll' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 40-40: 'beforeEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 41-41: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 42-42: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 43-43: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 43-43: Delete ·
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 46-46: 'afterEach' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 51-51: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 74-74: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 88-88: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 105-107: Replace ⏎······.mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)⏎······ with .mockResolvedValueOnce(mockFirstResponse)
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 113-113: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 122-122: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 133-133: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 141-141: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 147-147: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 148-149: Delete ⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 156-156: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 165-165: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 179-179: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 186-186: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 187-187: 'consoleErrorSpy' is already declared in the upper scope on line 28 column 7.
(no-shadow)
[error] 187-187: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 188-188: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 190-190: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 191-193: Replace ⏎······'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'⏎···· with 'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 194-194: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 196-197: Delete ⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
tests/fixtures/dashboardData.js
[error] 2-2: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 3-3: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 4-4: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 5-5: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 6-6: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 7-7: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 8-8: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 9-9: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 10-10: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 11-11: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 12-12: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 13-13: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 14-14: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 15-15: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 16-16: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 20-20: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 21-21: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 22-22: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 23-23: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 24-24: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 25-25: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 26-26: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 27-27: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 28-28: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 29-29: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 30-30: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 31-31: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 32-32: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 33-33: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 34-34: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 38-38: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 39-39: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 40-40: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 41-41: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 42-46: Replace ······nodes:·[⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},⏎················{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}⏎············ with nodes:·[{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·1·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·2·}·},·{·reactions:·{·totalCount:·3·}·}
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 47-47: Delete ······
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 48-48: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 49-49: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 53-53: Replace ···· with ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 54-54: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 55-55: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 56-56: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 57-57: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 59-59: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 60-60: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 61-61: Replace ········ with ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 62-62: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 65-65: Insert ⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 73-73: Replace } with ··}⏎
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 76-76: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 77-77: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 78-78: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 79-79: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 80-80: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js (2)
123-126: Error handling is still missing in the writeToFile function.
This issue was previously identified in a past review comment and remains unaddressed.
Line range hint 21-27: Verify security considerations for GitHub token usage.
The script uses a GitHub token for authentication. Please ensure:
- The token has minimal required permissions
- The token is properly secured in environment variables
- User-generated content is sanitized before writing to file
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the token usage in the build-dashboard.js file.
Let me check one more aspect regarding the environment setup and token usage in the dashboard build process.
GitHub token usage follows security best practices
The implementation shows secure token handling:
- Token is properly accessed via environment variables, not hardcoded
- Token is used only for read operations (GraphQL queries) with proper rate limiting
- dotenv configuration is properly set up in the tools directory
- Token is used with minimal scope for fetching public repository data (issues, PRs, discussions)
- User-generated content is properly sanitized before writing to file through JSON.stringify
The implementation follows security best practices for GitHub token usage in this context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential token exposure in configuration files
# Test: Look for any hardcoded tokens or credentials
rg -i "token|secret|password|credential" --type yaml --type json
Length of output: 5250
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific implementation of token usage in build-dashboard.js
rg -A 5 -B 5 "GITHUB_TOKEN" scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js
# Check for any environment variable loading mechanisms
rg -A 2 "require.*dotenv|import.*dotenv"
Length of output: 814
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variable validation or sanitization
rg -A 3 "process\.env\.GITHUB_TOKEN" --type js
# Check for any GitHub API related configuration or setup
cat scripts/dashboard/build-dashboard.js
Length of output: 6724
tests/dashboard/build-dashboard.test.js (2)
51-72: Well-structured test cases with good coverage!
The test suite demonstrates:
- Comprehensive coverage of edge cases
- Clear test descriptions
- Good use of mock data
- Proper error handling verification
- Effective file system operations testing
Also applies to: 74-86, 113-184
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 51-51: 'it' is not defined.
(no-undef)
187-196: Variable shadowing and grammatical issues in error handling test.
These issues were previously identified in an earlier review.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 187-187: 'consoleErrorSpy' is already declared in the upper scope on line 28 column 7.
(no-shadow)
[error] 187-187: 'jest' is not defined.
(no-undef)
[error] 188-188: Delete ··
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 190-190: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 191-193: Replace ⏎······'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'⏎···· with 'there·was·some·issues·while·parsing·this·item:·undefined'
(prettier/prettier)
[error] 194-194: Delete ····
(prettier/prettier)
asyncapi-bot
requested review from
BhaswatiRoy,
J0SAL,
TRohit20 and
VaishnaviNandakumar
|
/rtm |
anshgoyalevil
removed request for
VaishnaviNandakumar,
J0SAL,
BhaswatiRoy and
TRohit20
This PR adds tests for build-dashboard.js script.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests