Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

master <-- JCSP-515: fixing jpt for equifax run #69

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NataliiaShavshyna
Copy link
Contributor

@NataliiaShavshyna NataliiaShavshyna requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2020 06:31
}

private fun searchFilter() {
val filter = filters.recall()!!
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!! can throw NPE

import java.net.URI
import javax.json.JsonObject

class WorkOnSearch(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, rich, cross-platform workflow. Well done.

Comment on lines 56 to 60
searchWithJql = SearchCloudFilter(
jira = jira,
meter = meter,
filters = similarities.filtersMemory
),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like how much the scenario differences decrease and scenario similarities increase. It gives us more and more confidence that we're comparing apples to apples 👍

@dagguh dagguh requested a review from a team June 30, 2020 07:42
@@ -55,11 +54,6 @@ class JiraDcScenario : Scenario {
projectMemory = similarities.projectMemory,
createIssueButtons = listOf(By.id("create_link"))
),
searchWithJql = SearchServerFilter(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes are already in #69. Combining multiple changes in a single PR makes it messy. Reviewers have to review the same diffs multiple times. When one gets merged the other one has to rebase/resolve conflicts. The multi-change diff is huge and hard to understand.

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class JiraPerformanceComparisonIT {
val results: List<EdibleResult> = AbruptExecutorService(newCachedThreadPool()).use { pool ->
listOf(
benchmark("a.properties", JiraDcScenario::class.java, quality, pool),
benchmark("equifax.properties", JiraCloudScenario::class.java, quality, pool)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The file names were anonymous for a reason. Please, be more careful. FYI @ysemenkov

querryList.add("/issues/?jql=Application%20%3D%20\"Access%20Management\"%20" +
"and%20assignee%20%3D%20557057%3A68425415-a8ec-439d-a05b-0b03720dcadf%20" +
"and%20status%20in%20(Done)%20or%20assignee%20is%20empty%20" +
"and%20component%20in%20(.NET)%20AND%20\"Reporting%20Country\"%20%3D%20Canada%20" +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like UGC. Please never commit any user generated content to the repo!

@dagguh
Copy link
Contributor

dagguh commented Jul 27, 2020

WRT the title and the branch name. Please, don't send any sensitive stuff to the repo. It's all open source and public.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants